* Speech overlapping with espeak-ng
@ Samuel Thibault
` Samuel Thibault
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility
Hello,
Kirk Reiser, on Fri 13 Jan 2017 09:50:24 -0500, wrote:
> If you have speakup running with espeakup just review up or down the
> screen with the 7 and 9 keys. You can feel the speech doesn't cut off
> immediately and in fact it sounds like you are mixing the speech from
> the previous line in the current line. It gives a sound like a shoosh
> at the start of each keystroke.
Ok, I think I see what you mean.
I believe it's actually an effect of our ears :)
I have noticed that espeak-ng is way more "reactive" than espeak, in
that when espeakup uses espeak-ng, key press echo happens way more
immediately than with espeak. This is so that when ongoing speech is
interrupted by newer speech, there is no delay between the interrupted
speech and the new speech, and our ears mix the two. To get something
intelligible we need some delay, which happened to be introduced by
espeak only by luck, because it was taking time to start the speech. I
have uploaded to
http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/
a version of espeakup which introduces a 150ms delay after the cancel.
This should be small enough to keep reactivity, but long enough to
clearly separate speech. You can tune this value with the additional -c
parameter.
I'll try to introduce that in brltty too.
Samuel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Samuel Thibault @ ` Samuel Thibault ` Hart Larry ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Samuel Thibault 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote: > I'll try to introduce that in brltty too. I have uploaded brltty packages on http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter, e.g.: /sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla... or speech-parameters es:cancel_pause=150 Could people give a try to these packages, and see which value of the cancel pause they prefer? Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Hart Larry ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Samuel Thibault 2 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Hart Larry @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.; +Cc: debian-accessibility While its a different type of package, I notice this overlap in 1 of the newer Voxin 1.6 in Vinux. Also while arrowing, speech rate seems to drop by 1 step until you re-read the current line. Hart ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault ` Hart Larry @ ` Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault ` Mark Peveto 2 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Hello, Could people really please test these brltty and espeakup packages? In short: if I don't get feedback very soon, I'll have to revert them to espeak for Stretch, which would be very sad. If there is something preventing from doing the tests, please tell, I can't guess it. Since the migration to espeak-ng poses strong problems, we *have* to fix them before the release. If people don't actually test the fixes, there's no way we can be sure that things are alright. I did test these packages, but since I'm no speech user, I can't have a good idea of what *sounds* right. We have to decide very soon what to do for the next Debian release, Stretch. The full freeze is 5th February, we can't introduce big changes after that date, plus the 10-day migration period, it basically means we have to decide by 25th January. If I don't get reports saying that brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4 are now good, I'll revert to espeak by 25th January. To make testing yet easier, I have uploaded the packages to be tested (brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4) into experimental. They are now already available with: deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main Please test! Samuel Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote: > I have uploaded to > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > a version of espeakup which introduces a 150ms delay after the cancel. > This should be small enough to keep reactivity, but long enough to > clearly separate speech. You can tune this value with the additional -c > parameter. Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 16:19:55 +0100, wrote: > I have uploaded brltty packages on > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter, > e.g.: > > /sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla... > > or > > speech-parameters es:cancel_pause=150 > > Could people give a try to these packages, and see which value of the > cancel pause they prefer? Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Samuel Thibault @ ` Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault ` (2 more replies) ` Mark Peveto 1 sibling, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main to be more precise: after having added this line to /etc/apt/sources.list, run apt-get update apt-get install brltty=5.4-5 apt-get install espeakup=1:0.80-4 Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Samuel Thibault ` [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: " Tom Fowle ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Øyvind Lode ` [HEADS-UP] " Kirk Reiser 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: > > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > to be more precise: after having added this line to > /etc/apt/sources.list, run > > apt-get update > > apt-get install brltty=5.4-5 I meant brltty-espeak=5.4-5 of course, the brltty package does not contain the espeak driver, the brltty-espeak package does. Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Tom Fowle ` Samuel Thibault 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Tom Fowle @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup; +Cc: debian-accessibility Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with hardware synthesizers? and would not apply to such setups using wheezie? Thanks Tom Fowle On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:31:24 +0100, wrote: > > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: > > > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > > > to be more precise: after having added this line to > > /etc/apt/sources.list, run > > > > apt-get update > > > > apt-get install brltty=5.4-5 > > I meant brltty-espeak=5.4-5 of course, the brltty package does not > contain the espeak driver, the brltty-espeak package does. > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: " Tom Fowle @ ` Samuel Thibault 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.; +Cc: debian-accessibility Tom Fowle, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 20:31:27 -0800, wrote: > Am I correct to assume these versions do not effect use of speakup with > hardware synthesizers? Yes. > and would not apply to such setups using wheezie? It doesn't either. Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Øyvind Lode [not found] ` <20170123134123.gxnmb3spvq45ymrk@Kraftkrust> ` [HEADS-UP] " Kirk Reiser 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Øyvind Lode @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Hi: I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work now). I'll help you out test later today. What exactly should I test? I vaguely remember seeing a thread about some issues but I must say that I never noticed it myself. On 23 January 2017 at 13:31, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote: > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 13:21:03 +0100, wrote: >> deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > to be more precise: after having added this line to > /etc/apt/sources.list, run > > apt-get update > > apt-get install brltty=5.4-5 > > apt-get install espeakup=1:0.80-4 > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20170123134123.gxnmb3spvq45ymrk@Kraftkrust>]
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng [not found] ` <20170123134123.gxnmb3spvq45ymrk@Kraftkrust> @ ` Øyvind Lode ` [HEADS-UP part 2] " Samuel Thibault 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Øyvind Lode @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Hi: I've just tested by logging in on the console. To me all works as expected. That said I rarely login on the console since I use Debian as a server and do all admin work via ssh which means I really don't know whether what I get now on this server running sid is normal or not. However, speech on the console is very useful when I really need it like if network issues etc. I typed commands without issues. I read log files. I opened nano and I type really fast and of course I couldn't hear every character entered but I've never been able to do that when typing really fast. I edited the text and I also opened some real config files and did some editing. Sorry for not finding/hearing the speech overlap. On 23 January 2017 at 14:41, Sebastian Humenda <shumenda@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Øyvind > > Øyvind Lode schrieb am 23.01.2017, 14:12 +0100: >>I've upgraded both brltty and espeakup (remotely via ssh since I'm at work now). >>I'll help you out test later today. > Please also upgrade brltty-espeak. > >>What exactly should I test? > - Do you realize some kind of overlap when typing quickly? > - When navigating to a longer line, press Ctrl, do you recognize a delay > before the speech stops? > - You have to have a keyboard table configured for this, put > `keyboard-table laptop` into `/etc/brltty/brltty.conf` for this. > - When scrolling to a lot of text, say an inbox of Mutt, do you have the > feeling that speech overlaps? > - There is a parameter which introduces a certain cancelling pause, put that > into your /etc/brltty.conf: > `speech-parameters es:cancel_pause=150` > > 150 is the default value, please try different values (lower means less > pause), to figure out whether everything sounds as expected. > > For me, a value of e.g. 10 works really fine when typing, but when scrolling > through many lines of text, it still sounds weird, as if it would overlap. As > Samuel already pointed out on IRC and here, it might be not an actual overlap, > but one the ear percepts. > > At the moment, I feel as if a really small cancel pause would be the option I > could live best with. > > Thanks > Sebastian > -- > Web: http://www.crustulus.de (English|Deutsch) | Blog: http://www.crustulus.de/blog > FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionaries - http://www.freedict.org > Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: http://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng [not found] ` <20170123134123.gxnmb3spvq45ymrk@Kraftkrust> ` Øyvind Lode @ ` Samuel Thibault ` Al Sten-Clanton 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Humenda, kirk, debian-accessibility, speakup Hello, Thanks to Sebastian's tests and reports (we ended up recording what was produced with his audio setup), I could track and find what I believe was the bug. So, can people please test libespeak-ng1 version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 which should be available within a few hours? You can use the unstable versions of espeakup (1:0.80-5) and brltty (5.4-6), do not use the experimental versions which introduce a delay which is actually spurious. I hope this time it'll be good enough for Stretch :) The technical details are in https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/172#issuecomment-274682363 Basically, espeak used to close/reopen the audio card, which espeak-ng didn't, and some drivers or cards or something else doesn't really flush data if that's not done. I have to apologize to Kirk notably, it seems that depending on audio setups there indeed was real overlapping, not only ears glitches :) Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` [HEADS-UP part 2] " Samuel Thibault @ ` Al Sten-Clanton ` Samuel Thibault 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Al Sten-Clanton @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. When do you need test results by? Is it tomorrow, the 26th? Thanks! AlOn 01/23/2017 09:36 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks to Sebastian's tests and reports (we ended up recording what was > produced with his audio setup), I could track and find what I believe > was the bug. > > So, can people please test libespeak-ng1 version 1.49.0+dfsg-7 which > should be available within a few hours? You can use the unstable > versions of espeakup (1:0.80-5) and brltty (5.4-6), do not use the > experimental versions which introduce a delay which is actually > spurious. > > I hope this time it'll be good enough for Stretch :) > > The technical details are in > https://github.com/espeak-ng/espeak-ng/issues/172#issuecomment-274682363 > Basically, espeak used to close/reopen the audio card, which espeak-ng > didn't, and some drivers or cards or something else doesn't really flush > data if that's not done. > > I have to apologize to Kirk notably, it seems that depending on audio > setups there indeed was real overlapping, not only ears glitches :) > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Al Sten-Clanton @ ` Samuel Thibault ` Al Sten-Clanton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Al Sten-Clanton, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 21:40:01 -0500, wrote: > When do you need test results by? Is it tomorrow, the 26th? Thanks! By 25th, please :) Thanks, Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP part 2] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Al Sten-Clanton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Al Sten-Clanton @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. I'll try to do it. Al On 01/23/2017 09:46 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Al Sten-Clanton, on Mon 23 Jan 2017 21:40:01 -0500, wrote: >> When do you need test results by? Is it tomorrow, the 26th? Thanks! > > By 25th, please :) > > Thanks, > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Øyvind Lode @ ` Kirk Reiser ` Samuel Thibault 2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Kirk Reiser @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.; +Cc: debian-accessibility Hello Samuel and all: I have to say the fixes you put in over the past day or so have improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely. I've only done preliminary tests so far but it seems to behaving itself very well indeed. Almost instant flushing and clean sounding moving between lines with the review keys. I didn't think you were going to pull it off but you've done a very nice job Samuel. Thank you for working on this so diligently. Kirk -- Well that's it then, colour me secure! -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v1 mQENBFYV5DMBCAC060mbsnLhGPjnFkf0R0p+7MxcfxlOuy5wc8y59y9ZNF0RZD1s OTEsDih4vD9YJ3zA78VsBUDK47aiDWduh3nHzYN2ZSuxAQ9u7qPqphCG0jPagTU8 p7+Ceeya4I5odWtq+Nkf1UrHB7KKEtexphStSwUG5Bhi4bb84YinmX/a3I+OGV1D by4QBSdPvSuDw0qFkt/ucLyEwv4L6lDjoH2GF+tnCew4SJtliJFvA1k7NpWO6HW9 aWtBxfYU85ccZKBSE25y+9KprUCncVTpaVs3FztCWG0dQRXHvEbV+Damp/IBd9Jv HZX7azqbERUa/FjPTIlZhhI9VtaZaFfJSH+5ABEBAAG0HUtpcmsgUmVpc2VyIDxr aXJrQHJlaXNlcnMuY2E+iQE+BBMBAgAoBQJWFeQzAhsDBQkADS8ABgsJCAcDAgYV CAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRAHTEsk7UQUUoeuB/wIqsdLCfDrSvr3qg7rKBDg ru44OMuRit6hbdWFZjmxccCdjeNhBJRVd5wrEqjj5YoqQAhmacXaEB0DO/TZlDgo kUfJM7lrtQD4mYU9GVtrzJxCJoBUyeMVnMJt39F91tBu0mYM6oI/dv81dwxIv++4 hj55TZ4GG7DGYAy4LwNb+noNbivgOFHlnfNq8nxhZkHbJdYKP+sptZOL5sagmBQZ iS9STB54g/U7Jtt1Fe+JwDmbxQhbSHa9JuWn0xZ8CtYhrz06xSqZl5vpMlak3eW2 x6m6IcqZfyuI2K7W/9BCgcsQyYzufO4Gk9KyPNISskX6pFBLuNxIH6hdfxSYYm9y uQENBFYV5DMBCACtMyhHog5MR6eQUPTx7fWH5ntkgCtmWvQp4lcKj0HHbteDWglS NVbWKWEk9PAKA4UeQVUH4vOhTRhAPpuDUavLdp2tDtT7ZBVh91B3AWIM6+7fIvyU 2uYt1q/CNjga8RllXBT7mW2zHGEYQFIkBJvqlU0PN1HlxRZIbSSEb+zQuVAd+ph3 kt/oZon3ZbNmKg+arsYMmKkYJ0REwKQib7h5Xl31aK74XmWBp2Ky+lopsJSP8wpH AfC71h4s3LDm8ADHF1Ns4KuGZdLTugr8uiPm5kEJFGes1uYKy8R7OTFko0NEuJkv STfpPYnTU2qDCJBH08zZErI/6YBIlSsCSde3ABEBAAGJASUEGAECAA8FAlYV5DMC GwwFCQANLwAACgkQB0xLJO1EFFKAmgf/d3dk1/HgmF8rmvYVru/hJvmIpmiLqPl5 bYSwdZeU+k82qp3xACM2yMJhOh89SgHsaaqQAE1qo5rAJcSG7/+7M/kzf4u/WM/E unXDtLkbzi5Zl+gjoikrfOhgF0NmuGdlrOme8a6ue7+iE4XLAo0/jhVlh45O6Iq0 0DGyeFr22cR3jZj4wRmPw5zj4r/sWc06UfquVAEMmfIvJMaGYvwBI+TU6gI8MjLe VDY0vay/nQ79fXSLQmYEvjwKXIavQu9c8TFt0z9EDdoIMx69ZunqZuYQInxaT+cL i9zhihMGz4XA1q3blLNX3I0jWzAa23ZchI7htc3kfxp1jWqrGyGEIg== =nrPH -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` [HEADS-UP] " Kirk Reiser @ ` Samuel Thibault 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.; +Cc: debian-accessibility Kirk Reiser, on Tue 24 Jan 2017 13:06:16 -0500, wrote: > I have to say the fixes you put in over the past day or so have > improved espeak-ng responsiveness emensely. Cool :) Samuel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test Re: Speech overlapping with espeak-ng ` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Samuel Thibault ` Samuel Thibault @ ` Mark Peveto 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Mark Peveto @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Samuel Thibault Cc: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux., debian-accessibility Samual, I don't have a lot in the way of technical knowledge, but I can try to help you test. What do you need? I don't use brltty, so if that's what you're lookin for I might not be much help. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Could people really please test these brltty and espeakup packages? > > In short: if I don't get feedback very soon, I'll have to revert them to > espeak for Stretch, which would be very sad. > > If there is something preventing from doing the tests, please tell, I > can't guess it. > > Since the migration to espeak-ng poses strong problems, we *have* to > fix them before the release. If people don't actually test the fixes, > there's no way we can be sure that things are alright. I did test these > packages, but since I'm no speech user, I can't have a good idea of what > *sounds* right. > > We have to decide very soon what to do for the next Debian release, > Stretch. The full freeze is 5th February, we can't introduce big > changes after that date, plus the 10-day migration period, it basically > means we have to decide by 25th January. If I don't get reports saying > that brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4 are now good, I'll revert to > espeak by 25th January. > > To make testing yet easier, I have uploaded the packages to be tested > (brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4) into experimental. They are now > already available with: > > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > Please test! > > Samuel > > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote: > > I have uploaded to > > > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > > > a version of espeakup which introduces a 150ms delay after the cancel. > > This should be small enough to keep reactivity, but long enough to > > clearly separate speech. You can tune this value with the additional -c > > parameter. > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 16:19:55 +0100, wrote: > > I have uploaded brltty packages on > > > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > > > too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter, > > e.g.: > > > > /sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla... > > > > or > > > > speech-parameters es:cancel_pause=150 > > > > Could people give a try to these packages, and see which value of the > > cancel pause they prefer? > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
Speech overlapping with espeak-ng Samuel Thibault
` Samuel Thibault
` Hart Larry
` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Samuel Thibault
` Samuel Thibault
` Samuel Thibault
` [HEADS-UP] Please test?Re: " Tom Fowle
` Samuel Thibault
` [HEADS-UP] Please test " Øyvind Lode
[not found] ` <20170123134123.gxnmb3spvq45ymrk@Kraftkrust>
` Øyvind Lode
` [HEADS-UP part 2] " Samuel Thibault
` Al Sten-Clanton
` Samuel Thibault
` Al Sten-Clanton
` [HEADS-UP] " Kirk Reiser
` Samuel Thibault
` Mark Peveto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).