From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E57A71F0965; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:22:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-it0-x243.google.com (mail-it0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::243]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB801F08CF for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:22:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it0-x243.google.com with SMTP id o185so11547655itb.1 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:22:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=CHY8lD0JLja4Fy1z/PDaPz8ymv1KARvIfVyCe8eswuc=; b=IqqzRMv+zMScyMUQ8hv1p9H7vSBjZIzKsBEVNV1/zpa1cScDUhNqwhH0mhg+fSVbUf uxGXP5PB4WBCV5gEFnyEOyC2e5N6HiTZuGFKJ+rDpygDsH0s3Vyhys2Cz6awokiTwohH YuvYHUdWsr0svQ2+eU0Lk88Ws0Zsp4FY72oRaWLsyevJE+gHI6DGoRXmucsmzUx7VBGj nnz7FYmwh/QuSE3CQNQeRDQIy2IkJNrLhhfehK2SmTIvCH54mtXrrtYkZ7E0jqwy4Xm+ hGtUjowa9bz4dBNO+rtI7Mje0DTcq9sb8BK7SdszG5zAvtPw5wkzehA2xt2+1vC+DEXl fM5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=CHY8lD0JLja4Fy1z/PDaPz8ymv1KARvIfVyCe8eswuc=; b=Bwi65wh5nFY861+OVyF1XBrlMdIbnNNtn6J31NO6Qo17FXxTWKZPvsMR7xSFrohn4X 4P7ZwSfN5fZcm7IbZkXS5E3UPyoigCQfoannLkVurQQ2215gAafzzkibwXH6mX1Q5ysk uS4MR06R4DkF/21G7Nz6ut9OOS/6KMlLMq7IKwQMYpaxypJCgTTg2LUYMlvNQ5LD3Z94 4lIes0/tnbzqfNbKNykm7LmVaA1MQ9AXqdoPXR/KJXrpwA5V/lAhUTzR4R7jm5hZpwSK fp6r0hDrLWJeG0g8vXdIMzac6hfJQq0uKDCc7mFQwumpkuvpw2YwzsY2yazlknD08bwr ZFNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLNIXZeqrfczigY57ormbFmyInzzeUYZybHDNE0Ltfic1FtDWLlXteh34k+tS+m2Q== X-Received: by 10.36.200.10 with SMTP id w10mr15946952itf.21.1485202946869; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from purrwurr (63-152-98-48.cdrr.qwest.net. [63.152.98.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k205sm6997187ita.15.2017.01.23.12.22.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:22:26 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Peveto X-Google-Original-From: Mark Peveto Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:22:24 -0600 (CST) X-X-Sender: markp@purrwurr To: Samuel Thibault cc: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." , debian-accessibility@lists.debian.org Subject: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Re=3A_=5BHEADS-UP=5D_Please_test=A0Re=3A_Speech?= =?ISO-8859-15?Q?_overlapping_with_espeak-ng?= In-Reply-To: <20170123122103.GG1283@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> Message-ID: References: <20170123122103.GG1283@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LNX 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:22:33 -0000 Samual, I don't have a lot in the way of technical knowledge, but I can try to help you test. What do you need? I don't use brltty, so if that's what you're lookin for I might not be much help. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Could people really please test these brltty and espeakup packages? > > In short: if I don't get feedback very soon, I'll have to revert them to > espeak for Stretch, which would be very sad. > > If there is something preventing from doing the tests, please tell, I > can't guess it. > > Since the migration to espeak-ng poses strong problems, we *have* to > fix them before the release. If people don't actually test the fixes, > there's no way we can be sure that things are alright. I did test these > packages, but since I'm no speech user, I can't have a good idea of what > *sounds* right. > > We have to decide very soon what to do for the next Debian release, > Stretch. The full freeze is 5th February, we can't introduce big > changes after that date, plus the 10-day migration period, it basically > means we have to decide by 25th January. If I don't get reports saying > that brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4 are now good, I'll revert to > espeak by 25th January. > > To make testing yet easier, I have uploaded the packages to be tested > (brltty 5.4-5 and espeakup 0.80-4) into experimental. They are now > already available with: > > deb http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd buildd-experimental main > > Please test! > > Samuel > > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:57:48 +0100, wrote: > > I have uploaded to > > > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > > > a version of espeakup which introduces a 150ms delay after the cancel. > > This should be small enough to keep reactivity, but long enough to > > clearly separate speech. You can tune this value with the additional -c > > parameter. > > Samuel Thibault, on Sun 15 Jan 2017 16:19:55 +0100, wrote: > > I have uploaded brltty packages on > > > > http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ > > > > too. The delay can be changed with the cancel_pause espeak parameter, > > e.g.: > > > > /sbin/brltty -S cancel_pause=150 blabla... > > > > or > > > > speech-parameters es:cancel_pause=150 > > > > Could people give a try to these packages, and see which value of the > > cancel pause they prefer? > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup >