Tuxtalk

Tuxtalk

[JONATHAN CREASY]

Where can I get tuxtalk?

Re: Tuxtalk

[Raul A. Gallegos]

So what is it?

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, JONATHAN CREASY wrote:

> Where can I get tuxtalk?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

Re: Tuxtalk

[Geoff Shang]

Hi:

Tuxtalk such as it is can be obtained from the CVS repository.

Server: linux-speakup.org
User: anonymous
Password: please
Module: tuxtalk

Kirk please correct this if it's wrong.

I'm assuming you know how to use CVS, let me know if you don't.

Geoff.

Re: Tuxtalk

[Terry D. Cudney]

Hi,

	At this point, Tuxtalk is just a "toy" to play text to speech through your sound system.

	It doesn't work with Speakup, (yet).

	It is not a module (yet).

	It is a little program  based on the rsynth base to demonstrate that software speech can be done. It needs a lot of work to make it fast. It needs work on it's pronunciation to make it more intelligible. It will then need to be modularized to load into kernel space in order to be used with Speakup... We got a long way to go yet.

	But, like Geoff said, it's there in CVS for anyone to try, play, learn. Have fun!

		--terry

Name:	Terry D. Cudney
Phone:	(905)735-6127
E-mail:	terry@wasagacottage.com
Web:	www.wasagacottage.com

Re: Tuxtalk

[Victor Tsaran]

What will the existing Tuxtalk module add to the capabilities of Speakup,
compiled in the kernel? Does Speakup already communicate with this module?
Best regards,
Vic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Shang" <gshang@uq.net.au>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: Tuxtalk


> Hi:
>
> Tuxtalk such as it is can be obtained from the CVS repository.
>
> Server: linux-speakup.org
> User: anonymous
> Password: please
> Module: tuxtalk
>
> Kirk please correct this if it's wrong.
>
> I'm assuming you know how to use CVS, let me know if you don't.
>
> Geoff.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

Re: Tuxtalk

[Geoff Shang]

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Victor Tsaran wrote:

> What will the existing Tuxtalk module add to the capabilities of Speakup,
> compiled in the kernel? Does Speakup already communicate with this module?

No and no.  As far as I know, tuxtalk doesn't' actually compile as a module
yet.

Geoff.

Re: TuxTalk

[Kirk Reiser]

ace <ace@freedomchat.org> writes:

> I would be more than happy to write docs for programs which I use.  I asked
> a while back on the list if I am permitted to add to the Speakup manual and
> I never received a response.

Why should you receive a response?  If you make any significant
additions to any project either source code or documentation wise if
will be accepted if it's any good.  If you need permission then you'd
never get around to it in the first place.

  Kirk

-- 

Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061

Re: TuxTalk

[ace]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I would be more than happy to write docs for programs which I use.  I asked
a while back on the list if I am permitted to add to the Speakup manual and
I never received a response.

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:32:03PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Yeah, it would be nice if programmers, including myself, had time to
> help develop tuxtalk and many other projects. It would also be nice if
> programmers, and nonprogrammers alike had time to document what there
> already is to document in tuxtalk and other projects, (sigh).
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 04:11:17PM -0500, ace wrote:
> > Oh OK.  Apologies for my false statement.  LOL.  It just looks dead 
> > and untouched for ages.  Without documentation, it will be hard to 
> > use for anything useful but I did get it to read files.  I do not 
> > think that I was on this list at the time of the release of 
> > Speech-Dispatcher.  Oh well, it would be nice to see Tuxtalk develop 
> > into something useful.
> > 
> 
> - -- 
> web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org
> gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
> skype: gregn1
> (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)
> 
> - --
> Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFEJxZj7s9z/XlyUyARAiJ1AKDgE1jWs5izgQLP1ndu/H7EvW2ROQCg1CuG
> c2JXU9SitBshVNyTuJrB5nE=
> =JFqL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEKE3CwamDI1Gy2GIRAvbnAKDOUn/th2z5Dt7XlDXQasqMyP6SMQCghXzT
SMhaXympOb7jwvxFkEwaTpQ=
=Ebyk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: TuxTalk

[Gregory Nowak]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yeah, it would be nice if programmers, including myself, had time to
help develop tuxtalk and many other projects. It would also be nice if
programmers, and nonprogrammers alike had time to document what there
already is to document in tuxtalk and other projects, (sigh).

Greg


On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 04:11:17PM -0500, ace wrote:
> Oh OK.  Apologies for my false statement.  LOL.  It just looks dead 
> and untouched for ages.  Without documentation, it will be hard to 
> use for anything useful but I did get it to read files.  I do not 
> think that I was on this list at the time of the release of 
> Speech-Dispatcher.  Oh well, it would be nice to see Tuxtalk develop 
> into something useful.
> 

- -- 
web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org
gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)

- --
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEJxZj7s9z/XlyUyARAiJ1AKDgE1jWs5izgQLP1ndu/H7EvW2ROQCg1CuG
c2JXU9SitBshVNyTuJrB5nE=
=JFqL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: TuxTalk

[ace]

Oh OK.  Apologies for my false statement.  LOL.  It just looks dead 
and untouched for ages.  Without documentation, it will be hard to 
use for anything useful but I did get it to read files.  I do not 
think that I was on this list at the time of the release of 
Speech-Dispatcher.  Oh well, it would be nice to see Tuxtalk develop 
into something useful.

At 03:54 PM 3/26/2006, you wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>As far as I know, Kirk has not officially stated that tuxtalk isn't
>being developed anymore. In fact, when speech-dispatcher and
>speechd-up became a viable software speech solution for speakup, I
>posted to this list asking if that meant that tuxtalk wasn't going to
>be developed anymore, to which Kirk gave a resounding no, that
>tuxtalk will still be developed.
>
>Greg
>
>
>On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 01:45:28PM -0500, ace wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I know that this Tuxtalk synthesizer is no longer in development but I
> > checked it out just to see what it can do.  It sounds like a foreign person
> > with English as a second language...No offense to anyone on this list.
> > Hilarious.  I guess it has been abandoned, though, since the emergence of
> > Speech-Dispatcher and Flite/Festival.
> >
> > Thanks, Kirk, for the information regarding the other CVS server; I checked
> > out the source and am about to reboot with the new kernel.
> >
> > Robby
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFEJuFIwamDI1Gy2GIRAj52AJ9uobXjm9wAzXn04dCjuXbHVh4irgCgl+vd
> > /EMXZT7nttfNhQBH+GwtLqc=
> > =nT3e
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>- --
>web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org
>gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
>skype: gregn1
>(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)
>
>- --
>Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFEJv9t7s9z/XlyUyARAqvrAKC27/B7798WlcW4wYzCHXEa/hc5KQCgrjOF
>DO4urs3i/r2woUba5vJXvOs=
>=ZmVw
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

Re: TuxTalk

[Gregory Nowak]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As far as I know, Kirk has not officially stated that tuxtalk isn't
being developed anymore. In fact, when speech-dispatcher and
speechd-up became a viable software speech solution for speakup, I
posted to this list asking if that meant that tuxtalk wasn't going to
be developed anymore, to which Kirk gave a resounding no, that
tuxtalk will still be developed.

Greg


On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 01:45:28PM -0500, ace wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hey folks,
> 
> I know that this Tuxtalk synthesizer is no longer in development but I
> checked it out just to see what it can do.  It sounds like a foreign person
> with English as a second language...No offense to anyone on this list. 
> Hilarious.  I guess it has been abandoned, though, since the emergence of
> Speech-Dispatcher and Flite/Festival.
> 
> Thanks, Kirk, for the information regarding the other CVS server; I checked
> out the source and am about to reboot with the new kernel.
> 
> Robby
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFEJuFIwamDI1Gy2GIRAj52AJ9uobXjm9wAzXn04dCjuXbHVh4irgCgl+vd
> /EMXZT7nttfNhQBH+GwtLqc=
> =nT3e
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

- -- 
web site: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org
gpg public key: http://www.romuald.net.eu.org/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)

- --
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@EU.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEJv9t7s9z/XlyUyARAqvrAKC27/B7798WlcW4wYzCHXEa/hc5KQCgrjOF
DO4urs3i/r2woUba5vJXvOs=
=ZmVw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

TuxTalk

[ace]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey folks,

I know that this Tuxtalk synthesizer is no longer in development but I
checked it out just to see what it can do.  It sounds like a foreign person
with English as a second language...No offense to anyone on this list. 
Hilarious.  I guess it has been abandoned, though, since the emergence of
Speech-Dispatcher and Flite/Festival.

Thanks, Kirk, for the information regarding the other CVS server; I checked
out the source and am about to reboot with the new kernel.

Robby
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEJuFIwamDI1Gy2GIRAj52AJ9uobXjm9wAzXn04dCjuXbHVh4irgCgl+vd
/EMXZT7nttfNhQBH+GwtLqc=
=nT3e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: tuxtalk

[Steve Holmes]

When the lsmod listing was posted with yesterday's message, I had just
done the normal modprobe to bring up speakout.  When I experimented
with sftsyn, I was doing the echo ... >/proc/speakup/synth_name.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:48:35AM -0500, Kirk Reiser wrote:
> Did you use echo ... >/proc/speakup/synth_name or modprobe?  I'm not
> sure why it didn't switch over.
> 
>   Kirk
> 
> -- 
> 
> Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
> e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
> phone: (519) 661-3061
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
> 

-- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown

Re: tuxtalk

[Kirk Reiser]

Did you use echo ... >/proc/speakup/synth_name or modprobe?  I'm not
sure why it didn't switch over.

  Kirk

-- 

Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061

Re: tuxtalk

[Steve Holmes]

I *NEVER* got this to work with Speakup.  When I did a "say -d" I get
this:
daemon mode: No such device

Also, which order should I do the below commands? should I load
speakup_softsynth first followed by "say" (when fixed) or visa versa?

Also, I kept getting my speakout when I quite deliberately specified
speakup_sftsyn.  In fact, see the abreviated lsmod listing below.
Module                  Size  Used by    Not tainted
speakup_spkout          1928   0 (autoclean) (unused)
speakup_sftsyn          2352   0 (autoclean) [speakup_spkout]
speakupmain            42516   0 [speakup_spkout speakup_sftsyn]
nls_cp437               4316   2 (autoclean)
vfat                    9580   2 (autoclean)
fat                    30392   0 (autoclean) [vfat]

What I find interesting here is This lsmod listing was captured while
using the speakup_spkout (speakout synth).  Dunno why sftsyn would be
in the loop at all. 

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 10:22:46AM -0800, David Csercsics wrote:
> There
> is a binary called say which gets created in the current directory after
> you type make. Just copy that to somewhere in your path. If you're going
> to use tuxtalk with speakup you will need to make the softsynth device:
> mknod /dev/softsynth c 10 26 Then you'll just load the speakup_sftsyn
> module and starrt tuxtalk with: say -d You'll lose the console that you
> start tuxtalk on as tuxtalk will not go into the backgroup and if you
> try say -d & it doesn't work as expected. Also once the module is loaded
> be careful unloading it it locked my box up solid yesterday.
-- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown

Re: tuxtalk

[Steve Holmes]

I'm having all kinds of problems here trying to get tuxtalk to work -
especially with Speakup.  I did actually get the say command to speak
something by piping text into it via a pipe or <file.txt.  But it
hangs and I have to do a ctrl-C to exit the program every time.  When
I tried following some suggested steps recently, I got "daemon mode:
no such device" whenever I did a 'say -d'.

Now here is something really wierd.  When I do a 'modprobe
speakup_sftsyn', I my speakout synth comes up talking and the lsmod
listing shows the following.
Module                  Size  Used by    Not tainted
speakup_spkout          1928   0 (autoclean) (unused)
speakup_sftsyn          2352   0 (autoclean) [speakup_spkout]
speakupmain            42516   0 [speakup_spkout speakup_sftsyn]
nfsd                   65808   8
lockd                  46448   1 [nfsd]
sunrpc                 64476   1 [nfsd lockd]
............. rest removed.

The softsynth device was defined as softsynth c 10 26 per previous
instruction but I get no speech from tuxtalk but my speakout is going
along just fine but I had specified sftsyn <strange>.  I did a diff
compare on both the sources and compiled objects for the two synth
drivers in question and there are differences between sources as well
as objects so I figure the modules aren't duplicated or any of that.
The lsmod listing shows the wierd thing though.

Anyone figure this one out?:)
-- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown

Re: tuxtalk

[David Csercsics]

You'll get tuxtalk form the same place you get speakup CVS. You'll need CVS speakup for tuxtalk.

You'll get tuxtalk form the same place you get speakup CVS. You'll need CVS speakup for tuxtalk.

You'll get tuxtalk form the same place you get speakup CVS. You'll need CVS speakup for tuxtalk.

On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 09:04:36AM +0300, Sergey Fleytin wrote:
> Hello, all! I just tried to find and download tuxtalk but faild.
> Please, can someone provide me with a direct link? Another question
> is if tuxtalk will work with version 1.5 of speakup or i should
> download a cvs version?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Sergey.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

tuxtalk

[Sergey Fleytin]

Hello, all! I just tried to find and download tuxtalk but faild.
Please, can someone provide me with a direct link? Another question
is if tuxtalk will work with version 1.5 of speakup or i should
download a cvs version?

Thanks in advance.

Sergey.

Re: tuxtalk

[randy turner]

hi kerk,
i installed the libgdbm i still get the same errors
i am using an older version of slackware 8.1
so that might be my problem,
i plan to update soon,
what directory should tuxtalk be compiled in??
the only thing that i can think of here is
that i need to completly update my slackware
thanks to all
randy



On Sat, 20 Dec 2003,
Kirk Reiser wrote:

> There is no configure script.  You just check out tuxtalk and type
> make to compile it.  You will need to have libgdbm-dev or it's
> equivolent installed to compile.
>
>   Kirk
>
> --
>
> Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
> e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
> phone: (519) 661-3061
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

Re: tuxtalk

[randy turner]

thanks a lot,
i will install that lib
hope you have a great christmas
randy


On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Kirk Reiser wrote:

> There is no configure script.  You just check out tuxtalk and type
> make to compile it.  You will need to have libgdbm-dev or it's
> equivolent installed to compile.
>
>   Kirk
>
> --
>
> Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
> e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
> phone: (519) 661-3061
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

Re: tuxtalk

[Lorenzo Prince]

The famous speaker who no one had heard of said:
> how is tuxtalk's speach quality?

Well, I tried Tuxtalk once and it sounded like a Braille n Speak on canabis.  That was a couple of months ago, however, 
so it may have changed since then.

PRINCE

Re: tuxtalk

[Alex Snow]

how is tuxtalk's speach quality? I may test it on one of the boxes 
here but if it's quality isn't good at al then I'll just stay using my 
acent or my transport.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 10:22:46AM -0800, David 
Csercsics wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:00:55AM -0600, Deedra Waters wrote: > tuxtalk
> has no documentation, and I can understand why since it's  still being
> written, but  I have a few questions conciddering the docs that are there
> don't match what you should be doing.  > > I typed make to compile it,
> but now what? you can't make install it, and I see no binary that I
> can even run. does anyone have a little more detail that they can fill
> in here? I'm willing to write basic install instructions so that there
> isn't any more confusion like this if knowone else wants to, heh > There
> is a binary called say which gets created in the current directory after
> you type make. Just copy that to somewhere in your path. If you're going
> to use tuxtalk with speakup you will need to make the softsynth device:
> mknod /dev/softsynth c 10 26 Then you'll just load the speakup_sftsyn
> module and starrt tuxtalk with: say -d You'll lose the console that you
> start tuxtalk on as tuxtalk will not go into the backgroup and if you
> try say -d & it doesn't work as expected. Also once the module is loaded
> be careful unloading it it locked my box up solid yesterday.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.

Re: tuxtalk

[David Csercsics]

On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:00:55AM -0600, Deedra Waters wrote: > tuxtalk
has no documentation, and I can understand why since it's  still being
written, but  I have a few questions conciddering the docs that are there
don't match what you should be doing.  > > I typed make to compile it,
but now what? you can't make install it, and I see no binary that I
can even run. does anyone have a little more detail that they can fill
in here? I'm willing to write basic install instructions so that there
isn't any more confusion like this if knowone else wants to, heh > There
is a binary called say which gets created in the current directory after
you type make. Just copy that to somewhere in your path. If you're going
to use tuxtalk with speakup you will need to make the softsynth device:
mknod /dev/softsynth c 10 26 Then you'll just load the speakup_sftsyn
module and starrt tuxtalk with: say -d You'll lose the console that you
start tuxtalk on as tuxtalk will not go into the backgroup and if you
try say -d & it doesn't work as expected. Also once the module is loaded
be careful unloading it it locked my box up solid yesterday.

tuxtalk

[Deedra Waters]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

tuxtalk has no documentation, and I can understand why since it's  still being written, but  I have a few questions conciddering the docs that are there don't match what you should be doing.

I typed make to compile it, but now what? you can't make install it, and I see no binary that I can even run. does anyone have a little more detail that they can fill in here? I'm willing to write basic install instructions so that there isn't any more confusion like this if knowone else wants to, heh

Thanks!


- -- 
Gentoo Linux: Gentoo infrastructure, dmwaters@gentoo.org,
http://www.gentoo.org

Freenode staff member: dmwaters@freenode.net , http://www.freenode.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/5IBOU5AGPOTGNc8RAhmmAJ9pzmWWEAAjd820ETyyD37mxXJnvwCgt7Vm
Hlrue7A+ltdazKw5fEaVrc0=
=CnIK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: tuxtalk

[Kirk Reiser]

There is no configure script.  You just check out tuxtalk and type
make to compile it.  You will need to have libgdbm-dev or it's
equivolent installed to compile.

  Kirk

-- 

Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061

tuxtalk

[randy turner]

hi all,
will tuxtalk work with slackware?
i got the cvs version
but i can't seem to compile it.
i read the instructions
but i can't find a ./configure script
in the package.
i might be missing something here.
hi to all on the list
randy

Re: tuxtalk

[Terry Cudney]

Hi,

	Tuxtalk is nowhere near a useable state for working with speakup. The cvs version which you can  grab and try, simply takes text that you tyupe in to  tuxtalk directly and vocalizes it out through your speakers.

	Kirk's plan has been to modularize it and load it into the kernel. Speakup is not yet ready for modular synth drivers. It's gonna be a while, but don't discount it yet.

		--terry

Name:	Terry D. Cudney
Phone:	(905)735-6127
E-mail:	tcudney@sympatico.ca
Web:	www3.sympatico.ca/tcudney

Smart people speak from experience.
Smarter people, from experience, listen.

Re: Tuxtalk

[JONATHAN CREASY]

i dunno, i found a newsleter called tuxtalk which was for the embedded
linux consortium
is it also a software synth?


>>> raul@asmodean.net 06/08/01 02:32PM >>>
So what is it?

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, JONATHAN CREASY wrote:

> Where can I get tuxtalk?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca 
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup 
>


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca 
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup