* Re: W3m or Lynx
W3m or Lynx Victor Tsaran
@ ` Jacob Schmude
` Victor Tsaran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Schmude @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup; +Cc: Speakup List
Hi
W3M is another text-based web browser. It's a little awkward,
because there seems to be no way to number links. It doesn't do a bad job
with frames, and if it's compiled correctly with the OpenSSL library, it
can use SSL, as lynx can. Personally, I like lynx, as it gives more
flexibility with regard to the download of files, and option
settings. Lynx also decolumnizes sights such as www.debian.org, where w3m
does not do this. However, with w3m you can actually use it like emacs/w3
in that you can arrow through the web page line at a time. Each one has
its good and bad points, it's too bad none of them support javascript yet.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> Hi, Kirk!
> On Linux-speakup.org you say that "for those who use either Lynx or W3m".
> What is W3m?
> Regards,
> Vic
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: W3m or Lynx
` Victor Tsaran
@ ` Jacob Schmude
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Schmude @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi
It seems to be. The rpm is *not* up to date at all. I believe the
version current is 0.1.8, but I haven't checked recently.
BTW: This is not an emacs lisp program, it just has some
similarities to it.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> Thanks, Jacob! I will get to RPMfind.net and see if I can get hold of the
> .rpm of W3m to try it out. Is it in contstant development like Lynx? "Cos
> Emacs/W3 seems to be halted.
> Regards,
> Vic
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jacob Schmude" <jacobs@ncinter.net>
> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Cc: "Speakup List" <speakup@speech.braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 7:25 PM
> Subject: Re: W3m or Lynx
>
>
> > Hi
> > W3M is another text-based web browser. It's a little awkward,
> > because there seems to be no way to number links. It doesn't do a bad job
> > with frames, and if it's compiled correctly with the OpenSSL library, it
> > can use SSL, as lynx can. Personally, I like lynx, as it gives more
> > flexibility with regard to the download of files, and option
> > settings. Lynx also decolumnizes sights such as www.debian.org, where w3m
> > does not do this. However, with w3m you can actually use it like emacs/w3
> > in that you can arrow through the web page line at a time. Each one has
> > its good and bad points, it's too bad none of them support javascript yet.
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Kirk!
> > > On Linux-speakup.org you say that "for those who use either Lynx or
> W3m".
> > > What is W3m?
> > > Regards,
> > > Vic
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* W3m or Lynx
@ Victor Tsaran
` Jacob Schmude
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Victor Tsaran @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup List
Hi, Kirk!
On Linux-speakup.org you say that "for those who use either Lynx or W3m".
What is W3m?
Regards,
Vic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: W3m or Lynx
` Jacob Schmude
@ ` Victor Tsaran
` Jacob Schmude
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Victor Tsaran @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Thanks, Jacob! I will get to RPMfind.net and see if I can get hold of the
.rpm of W3m to try it out. Is it in contstant development like Lynx? "Cos
Emacs/W3 seems to be halted.
Regards,
Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacob Schmude" <jacobs@ncinter.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Cc: "Speakup List" <speakup@speech.braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: W3m or Lynx
> Hi
> W3M is another text-based web browser. It's a little awkward,
> because there seems to be no way to number links. It doesn't do a bad job
> with frames, and if it's compiled correctly with the OpenSSL library, it
> can use SSL, as lynx can. Personally, I like lynx, as it gives more
> flexibility with regard to the download of files, and option
> settings. Lynx also decolumnizes sights such as www.debian.org, where w3m
> does not do this. However, with w3m you can actually use it like emacs/w3
> in that you can arrow through the web page line at a time. Each one has
> its good and bad points, it's too bad none of them support javascript yet.
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Victor Tsaran wrote:
>
> > Hi, Kirk!
> > On Linux-speakup.org you say that "for those who use either Lynx or
W3m".
> > What is W3m?
> > Regards,
> > Vic
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
W3m or Lynx Victor Tsaran
` Jacob Schmude
` Victor Tsaran
` Jacob Schmude
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).