From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moose.erie.net([208.138.204.11]) (1898 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 22:23:53 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from jscp (dap-208-166-66-151.erie-tnt-1.pa.erie.net [208.166.66.151]) by moose.erie.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA12541; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 22:18:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Envelope-To: speakup@speech.braille.uwo.ca Received: from jacobs (helo=localhost) by jscp with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 135JAK-00005c-00; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 22:25:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 22:25:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Jacob Schmude X-Sender: jacobs@jscp To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca cc: Speakup List Subject: Re: W3m or Lynx In-Reply-To: <000501bfdcc8$365b8280$07125b80@wang> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Hi W3M is another text-based web browser. It's a little awkward, because there seems to be no way to number links. It doesn't do a bad job with frames, and if it's compiled correctly with the OpenSSL library, it can use SSL, as lynx can. Personally, I like lynx, as it gives more flexibility with regard to the download of files, and option settings. Lynx also decolumnizes sights such as www.debian.org, where w3m does not do this. However, with w3m you can actually use it like emacs/w3 in that you can arrow through the web page line at a time. Each one has its good and bad points, it's too bad none of them support javascript yet. On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Victor Tsaran wrote: > Hi, Kirk! > On Linux-speakup.org you say that "for those who use either Lynx or W3m". > What is W3m? > Regards, > Vic > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > >