From: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: speakup@linux-speakup.org, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: TODO file
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:07:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190314110726.3bcc7bcf@narunkot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312220915.qgtag5vezpaouoxp@function>
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:09:15 +0100
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Okash Khawaja, le mar. 12 mars 2019 20:26:52 +0000, a ecrit:
> > For now, I wanted to ask how much of this part is still to be done:
> >
> > "The first issue has to do with the way speakup communicates with
> > serial ports. Currently, we communicate directly with the hardware
> > ports. This however conflicts with the standard serial port
> > drivers, which poses various problems. This is also not working for
> > modern hardware such as PCI-based serial ports. Also, there is not
> > a way we can communicate with USB devices. The current serial port
> > handling code is in serialio.c in this directory."
>
> You have done it all :)
>
> (even if, as you mentioned, the USB auto-probing would now be great)
>
> Samuel
Great, thanks. At the end of this exercise, I'll update TODO file and
add usb auto-probing to it.
Regarding:
"Some places are currently using in_atomic() because speakup functions
are called in various contexts, and a couple of things can't happen
in these cases. Pushing work to some worker thread would probably help,
as was already done for the serial port driving part."
I can't find any reference to in_atomic() in speakup code. According to
"Atomic context and kernel API design" [1] lwn article, in_atomic()
started being phased out of general kernel code around 2.6.26. I guess
this commit removed remaining references to in_atomic: d7500135802c
"Staging: speakup: Move pasting into a work item". Is there any more
work to be done for this?
Also can someone give a bit of a background or pointers regarding
moving kobjects:
"The kobjects may have to move to a more proper place in /sys. The
discussion on lkml resulted to putting speech synthesizers in the
"speech" class, and the speakup screen reader itself into
/sys/class/vtconsole/vtcon0/speakup, the nasty path being handled by
userland tools."
Thanks,
Okash
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/274695/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Okash Khawaja
` Samuel Thibault
` Okash Khawaja [this message]
` Samuel Thibault
` Okash Khawaja
` Samuel Thibault
` Okash Khawaja
` Samuel Thibault
` Okash Khawaja
` Gregory Nowak
` Samuel Thibault
` Gregory Nowak
` Janina Sajka
` Tom Fowle
` Janina Sajka
` doubletalks Tom Fowle
` doubletalks Tom Fowle
` doubletalks Janina Sajka
` doubletalks Tom Fowle
` TODO file John Covici
` John Covici
Gregory Nowak
` Tom Fowle
` John Covici
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190314110726.3bcc7bcf@narunkot \
--to=okash.khawaja@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=speakup@linux-speakup.org \
--cc=w.d.hubbs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).