* ACB
@ cwhitley
` ACB Deedra Waters
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: cwhitley @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
>On Mon, 20 May 2002 08:44:03 -0400 Charles Crawford <ccrawford@acb.org>
wrote.
> OK, now I need to speak from the view of the American council of
>the blind with respect to this thread.
>
> We want to see alternatives to the dominant Ms-Windows operating
>system and applications that are accessible and user friendly. We realize
>there is a culture around Linux that we do not wish to displace or
>otherwise change, yet the culture demands a level of personal involvement
>and knowledge that is neither easy to obtain from the available resources
>nor easy to learn once those resources are found. Hence, the participation
>of the wider blindness community is not likely unless there are new ways of
>learning and using Linux that maintain the accessibility and lack of
>expense that are so attractive.
>
> It is not a matter of telling folks to read the manual when the
>manual is prefaced upon an expectation of understanding that is greater
>than the average person starting out. Neither is it helpful to assume that
>everyone is going to be able to prioritize their time to dedicate to Linux
>in the same way as others have.
>
> This is not a hobby. It is an operating system for use by those
>who need the access and affordability of it. So let's admit that we need
>to accommodate those interests and find a way to do it that is not
>threatening to the current community of users.
>
> For the reasons above, ACBH is attempting to find the resources to
>get the internal speech engine we need to put speakup inside the box with
>internal quality speech. That will expand the user base because we won't
>be hunting around for hardware that is slowly disappearing.
>
> Next we need to look at the usability issue. This does not mean
>we try and change the nature of Linux and it's syntax, but we do need to
>look at any avenues to either make it more easy for folks to learn the
>context through tutorials for example or possible other ways.
>
> In the end, Linux is a robust product that need not be seen as
>having only one road to access. So let's stop making assumptions about the
>people who are only trying to use this cool operating system and start
>making an environment that supports all who want to use it.
>
>-- Charlie Crawford.
>At 04:34 PM 5/19/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>I think that most people know how to search for things on the internet. I
>> think you need to stop and think about the fact that not all people are
>>good at finding things and that's why we ask for help. If I could find all
>>of the answers to my problems, I wouldn't be asking.:p Before you start
>>treating new people like their idiots, try to remember that we're all
>>different, we all learn in different ways, and sometimes we miss stuff.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 19 May 2002, Janina Sajka wrote:
>>
>> > All right, Newbies, Listen Up!
>> >
>> > There's something called Google. It's your friend. You use it
>> > with your favorite web browser. It's real easy and it's lynx
>> > friendly. And, it finds the answers to almost all of the "where
>> > do I find" questions I've seen on this list in the last 6 months,
>> > and puts them on the first screen of results.
>> >
>> > Learn to use Google. Keep it open in a second console.
>> >
>> > The field where you type in your search string is the fourth
>> > field on the main Google screen. The submit button is the next
>> > field.
>> >
>> > This is not rocket science. It isn't even hard.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Speakup mailing list
>> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>> >
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Speakup mailing list
>>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
Hi,
Might I inquire as to how Linux is any worse today than DOS was? Both are
text mode, command line oriented OS's. There were very successfull DOS
users that happened to be blind. Of course, at the time GUI had not caught
on with the sighted world, but it did exist. I am not saying that progress
doesn't need to be made, just that you seem to be stating the problem worse
than it actually is. There are actually some DOS users still out there.
Regards,
Cecil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ACB
ACB cwhitley
@ ` Deedra Waters
` ACB Igor Gueths
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Deedra Waters @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Honestly, in my opinion, linux appears to be a lot mor complicated then
dos was, I haven't used dos in probably seven years or mor, but that's my
observation.
On Mon, 20 May 2002, cwhitley wrote:
Hi,
Might I inquire as to how Linux is any worse today than DOS was? Both are
text mode, command line oriented OS's. There were very successfull DOS
users that happened to be blind. Of course, at the time GUI had not
caught
on with the sighted world, but it did exist. I am not saying that
progress
doesn't need to be made, just that you seem to be stating the problem
worse
than it actually is. There are actually some DOS users still out there.
Regards,
Cecil
> >On Mon, 20 May 2002 08:44:03 -0400 Charles Crawford <ccrawford@acb.org>
> wrote.
> > OK, now I need to speak from the view of the American council of
> >the blind with respect to this thread.
> >
> > We want to see alternatives to the dominant Ms-Windows operating
> >system and applications that are accessible and user friendly. We realize
> >there is a culture around Linux that we do not wish to displace or
> >otherwise change, yet the culture demands a level of personal involvement
> >and knowledge that is neither easy to obtain from the available resources
> >nor easy to learn once those resources are found. Hence, the participation
>
> >of the wider blindness community is not likely unless there are new ways of
>
> >learning and using Linux that maintain the accessibility and lack of
> >expense that are so attractive.
> >
> > It is not a matter of telling folks to read the manual when the
> >manual is prefaced upon an expectation of understanding that is greater
> >than the average person starting out. Neither is it helpful to assume that
>
> >everyone is going to be able to prioritize their time to dedicate to Linux
> >in the same way as others have.
> >
> > This is not a hobby. It is an operating system for use by those
> >who need the access and affordability of it. So let's admit that we need
> >to accommodate those interests and find a way to do it that is not
> >threatening to the current community of users.
> >
> > For the reasons above, ACBH is attempting to find the resources to
>
> >get the internal speech engine we need to put speakup inside the box with
> >internal quality speech. That will expand the user base because we won't
> >be hunting around for hardware that is slowly disappearing.
> >
> > Next we need to look at the usability issue. This does not mean
> >we try and change the nature of Linux and it's syntax, but we do need to
> >look at any avenues to either make it more easy for folks to learn the
> >context through tutorials for example or possible other ways.
> >
> > In the end, Linux is a robust product that need not be seen as
> >having only one road to access. So let's stop making assumptions about the
>
> >people who are only trying to use this cool operating system and start
> >making an environment that supports all who want to use it.
> >
> >-- Charlie Crawford.
> >At 04:34 PM 5/19/02 -0400, you wrote:
> >>I think that most people know how to search for things on the internet. I
> >> think you need to stop and think about the fact that not all people are
> >>good at finding things and that's why we ask for help. If I could find all
> >>of the answers to my problems, I wouldn't be asking.:p Before you start
> >>treating new people like their idiots, try to remember that we're all
> >>different, we all learn in different ways, and sometimes we miss stuff.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Sun, 19 May 2002, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >>
> >> > All right, Newbies, Listen Up!
> >> >
> >> > There's something called Google. It's your friend. You use it
> >> > with your favorite web browser. It's real easy and it's lynx
> >> > friendly. And, it finds the answers to almost all of the "where
> >> > do I find" questions I've seen on this list in the last 6 months,
> >> > and puts them on the first screen of results.
> >> >
> >> > Learn to use Google. Keep it open in a second console.
> >> >
> >> > The field where you type in your search string is the fourth
> >> > field on the main Google screen. The submit button is the next
> >> > field.
> >> >
> >> > This is not rocket science. It isn't even hard.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Speakup mailing list
> >> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Speakup mailing list
> >>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Speakup mailing list
> >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> Hi,
> Might I inquire as to how Linux is any worse today than DOS was? Both are
> text mode, command line oriented OS's. There were very successfull DOS
> users that happened to be blind. Of course, at the time GUI had not caught
> on with the sighted world, but it did exist. I am not saying that progress
> doesn't need to be made, just that you seem to be stating the problem worse
> than it actually is. There are actually some DOS users still out there.
> Regards,
> Cecil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Deedra Waters
@ ` Igor Gueths
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Igor Gueths @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi Debra. You're right about that, but everything that is complicated in Linux is so for a reason. Winblows on the other hand! Just too much crap that doesn't even need to be there for us blind folks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Deedra Waters <curi0315@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: ACB
> Honestly, in my opinion, linux appears to be a lot mor complicated then
> dos was, I haven't used dos in probably seven years or mor, but that's my
> observation.
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, cwhitley wrote:
> Hi,
> Might I inquire as to how Linux is any worse today than DOS was? Both are
> text mode, command line oriented OS's. There were very successfull DOS
> users that happened to be blind. Of course, at the time GUI had not
> caught
> on with the sighted world, but it did exist. I am not saying that
> progress
> doesn't need to be made, just that you seem to be stating the problem
> worse
> than it actually is. There are actually some DOS users still out there.
> Regards,
> Cecil
>
> > >On Mon, 20 May 2002 08:44:03 -0400 Charles Crawford <ccrawford@acb.org>
> > wrote.
> > > OK, now I need to speak from the view of the American council of
> > >the blind with respect to this thread.
> > >
> > > We want to see alternatives to the dominant Ms-Windows operating
> > >system and applications that are accessible and user friendly. We realize
> > >there is a culture around Linux that we do not wish to displace or
> > >otherwise change, yet the culture demands a level of personal involvement
> > >and knowledge that is neither easy to obtain from the available resources
> > >nor easy to learn once those resources are found. Hence, the participation
> >
> > >of the wider blindness community is not likely unless there are new ways of
> >
> > >learning and using Linux that maintain the accessibility and lack of
> > >expense that are so attractive.
> > >
> > > It is not a matter of telling folks to read the manual when the
> > >manual is prefaced upon an expectation of understanding that is greater
> > >than the average person starting out. Neither is it helpful to assume that
> >
> > >everyone is going to be able to prioritize their time to dedicate to Linux
> > >in the same way as others have.
> > >
> > > This is not a hobby. It is an operating system for use by those
> > >who need the access and affordability of it. So let's admit that we need
> > >to accommodate those interests and find a way to do it that is not
> > >threatening to the current community of users.
> > >
> > > For the reasons above, ACBH is attempting to find the resources to
> >
> > >get the internal speech engine we need to put speakup inside the box with
> > >internal quality speech. That will expand the user base because we won't
> > >be hunting around for hardware that is slowly disappearing.
> > >
> > > Next we need to look at the usability issue. This does not mean
> > >we try and change the nature of Linux and it's syntax, but we do need to
> > >look at any avenues to either make it more easy for folks to learn the
> > >context through tutorials for example or possible other ways.
> > >
> > > In the end, Linux is a robust product that need not be seen as
> > >having only one road to access. So let's stop making assumptions about the
> >
> > >people who are only trying to use this cool operating system and start
> > >making an environment that supports all who want to use it.
> > >
> > >-- Charlie Crawford.
> > >At 04:34 PM 5/19/02 -0400, you wrote:
> > >>I think that most people know how to search for things on the internet. I
> > >> think you need to stop and think about the fact that not all people are
> > >>good at finding things and that's why we ask for help. If I could find all
> > >>of the answers to my problems, I wouldn't be asking.:p Before you start
> > >>treating new people like their idiots, try to remember that we're all
> > >>different, we all learn in different ways, and sometimes we miss stuff.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On Sun, 19 May 2002, Janina Sajka wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > All right, Newbies, Listen Up!
> > >> >
> > >> > There's something called Google. It's your friend. You use it
> > >> > with your favorite web browser. It's real easy and it's lynx
> > >> > friendly. And, it finds the answers to almost all of the "where
> > >> > do I find" questions I've seen on this list in the last 6 months,
> > >> > and puts them on the first screen of results.
> > >> >
> > >> > Learn to use Google. Keep it open in a second console.
> > >> >
> > >> > The field where you type in your search string is the fourth
> > >> > field on the main Google screen. The submit button is the next
> > >> > field.
> > >> >
> > >> > This is not rocket science. It isn't even hard.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Speakup mailing list
> > >> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > >> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Speakup mailing list
> > >>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > >>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Speakup mailing list
> > >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > Hi,
> > Might I inquire as to how Linux is any worse today than DOS was? Both are
> > text mode, command line oriented OS's. There were very successfull DOS
> > users that happened to be blind. Of course, at the time GUI had not caught
> > on with the sighted world, but it did exist. I am not saying that progress
> > doesn't need to be made, just that you seem to be stating the problem worse
> > than it actually is. There are actually some DOS users still out there.
> > Regards,
> > Cecil
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ACB
@ cwhitley
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: cwhitley @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi Deedra,
remember memory management? Getting a dos machine networked with speech was
anything but simple. Function for function Linux isn't any worse. I
believe where you are seeing complexity is in the fact that there are many
more functions available. I don't think linux is any worse than dos for the
functions that were supported by dos. I.e. word processing, terminal
emulation, email, what else did we use dos for???
BTW, for the games question, nethack is available and configured correctly
it uses curses in text mode. I think adom is also available for linux. The
omega source code is out there as well. Get the idea that i'm into the d&d
style games? I've also got c source code for a lot of the "bbs doors"
programs from circa 1985-88, but they're on 5 1/4" and I no longer have a
drive to read them with.... Lot of good that does eh?
Regards,
Cecil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ACB
ACB cwhitley
@ ` Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Dave Hunt <
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Rasnita @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple than
that.
Not that I am a big fan of games, but it was about games.
Teddy,
orasnita@home.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "cwhitley" <cwhitley@ec.rr.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: ACB
Hi Deedra,
remember memory management? Getting a dos machine networked with speech was
anything but simple. Function for function Linux isn't any worse. I
believe where you are seeing complexity is in the fact that there are many
more functions available. I don't think linux is any worse than dos for the
functions that were supported by dos. I.e. word processing, terminal
emulation, email, what else did we use dos for???
BTW, for the games question, nethack is available and configured correctly
it uses curses in text mode. I think adom is also available for linux. The
omega source code is out there as well. Get the idea that i'm into the d&d
style games? I've also got c source code for a lot of the "bbs doors"
programs from circa 1985-88, but they're on 5 1/4" and I no longer have a
drive to read them with.... Lot of good that does eh?
Regards,
Cecil
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
@ ` Dave Hunt <
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Cecil H. Whitley
` ACB Janina Sajka
2 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hunt < @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
-Dave
Octavian Rasnita writes:
> Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple than
> that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Dave Hunt <
@ ` Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Janina Sajka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Rasnita @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Are simple games, with no action. You just sit and think, move a piece.
Boring.
Teddy,
orasnita@home.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hunt <" <dave.hunt2@verizon.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: ACB
If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
-Dave
Octavian Rasnita writes:
> Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple
than
> that.
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
@ ` Janina Sajka
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Patricia Logan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Janina Sajka @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Are simple games, with no action. You just sit and think, move a piece.
> Boring.
Yes, we can tell you don't like thinking. It is very evident.
>
> Teddy,
> orasnita@home.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Hunt <" <dave.hunt2@verizon.net>
> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:53 AM
> Subject: Re: ACB
>
>
> If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
>
> -Dave
>
>
> Octavian Rasnita writes:
> > Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> > other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> > I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple
> than
> > that.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
--
Janina Sajka, Director
Technology Research and Development
Governmental Relations Group
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
Chair, Accessibility SIG
Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
http://www.openebook.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Janina Sajka
@ ` Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Patricia Logan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Rasnita @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I've said "just sit and think".
I like the action, not only to think and press some keys.
Is the computer only for those who like to think a lot?
Or you were talking about Linux only?
Teddy,
orasnita@home.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Janina Sajka" <janina@afb.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: ACB
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> > Are simple games, with no action. You just sit and think, move a piece.
> > Boring.
>
>
> Yes, we can tell you don't like thinking. It is very evident.
> >
> > Teddy,
> > orasnita@home.ro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Hunt <" <dave.hunt2@verizon.net>
> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: ACB
> >
> >
> > If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> >
> > Octavian Rasnita writes:
> > > Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos
and
> > > other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> > > I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple
> > than
> > > that.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka, Director
> Technology Research and Development
> Governmental Relations Group
> American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
>
> Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
>
> Chair, Accessibility SIG
> Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
> http://www.openebook.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Janina Sajka
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
@ ` Patricia Logan
` ACB Gregory Nowak
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Patricia Logan @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Dear Janina,
I apologize for being so late in replying to a Wednesday
message. Unfortunately, I have been hospitalized for several
days and only got home yesterday.
I feel your comment about Teddy not liking to think was
both unfair and flat out wrong. Anyone who could attain such a
good grasp of English without residing in an English speaking
country for a sustained period of time is obviously very
intelligent and has no doubt studied and practiced quite a lot.
I too cannot make head nor tail of man pages and it
doesn't mean that I am stupid. It will take me years to master
linux with the help of friends and I hope I am successful.
Meanwhile, I hope I will soon master the specific area which
are going to enrich my life immeasurably.
I find it just as annoying as othrs when people post
extensively about Windows. I have no desire to learn it no
matter what, even if I am jobless. However, people are
different. I think blind people must be very good at
conceptualizing, which I would call a form of thinking, to be
able to grasp the visual concepts necessary to transform
Windows from an incomprehensible jumble into something which
makes sense.
Pat Logan
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> > Are simple games, with no action. You just sit and think, move a piece.
> > Boring.
>
>
> Yes, we can tell you don't like thinking. It is very evident.
> >
> > Teddy,
> > orasnita@home.ro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Hunt <" <dave.hunt2@verizon.net>
> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: ACB
> >
> >
> > If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> >
> > Octavian Rasnita writes:
> > > Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> > > other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> > > I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple
> > than
> > > that.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Patricia Logan
@ ` Gregory Nowak
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Nowak @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I would have to agree here. Octavian says in one of his previous posts that he can only type English. True or not, this in itself is a grate demonstration of a will to learn. Also, learning English can be dificult, although it was certainly easier for me at the age of 9 then it would be for people at a later age.
Greg
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 10:28:19AM -0400, Patricia Logan wrote:
> Dear Janina,
>
> I apologize for being so late in replying to a Wednesday
> message. Unfortunately, I have been hospitalized for several
> days and only got home yesterday.
>
> I feel your comment about Teddy not liking to think was
> both unfair and flat out wrong. Anyone who could attain such a
> good grasp of English without residing in an English speaking
> country for a sustained period of time is obviously very
> intelligent and has no doubt studied and practiced quite a lot.
>
> I too cannot make head nor tail of man pages and it
> doesn't mean that I am stupid. It will take me years to master
> linux with the help of friends and I hope I am successful.
> Meanwhile, I hope I will soon master the specific area which
> are going to enrich my life immeasurably.
>
> I find it just as annoying as othrs when people post
> extensively about Windows. I have no desire to learn it no
> matter what, even if I am jobless. However, people are
> different. I think blind people must be very good at
> conceptualizing, which I would call a form of thinking, to be
> able to grasp the visual concepts necessary to transform
> Windows from an incomprehensible jumble into something which
> makes sense.
>
> Pat Logan
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 22 May 2002, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> >
> > > Are simple games, with no action. You just sit and think, move a piece.
> > > Boring.
> >
> >
> > Yes, we can tell you don't like thinking. It is very evident.
> > >
> > > Teddy,
> > > orasnita@home.ro
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dave Hunt <" <dave.hunt2@verizon.net>
> > > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:53 AM
> > > Subject: Re: ACB
> > >
> > >
> > > If Chess and Go are simple, you need to play better opponents. :-)
> > >
> > > -Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > Octavian Rasnita writes:
> > > > Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> > > > other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> > > > I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple
> > > than
> > > > that.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: ACB
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Dave Hunt <
@ ` Cecil H. Whitley
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` (2 more replies)
` ACB Janina Sajka
2 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Cecil H. Whitley @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi,
I believe both doom and quake are available for linux. They are graphical
however just like their dos counterparts.
Cecil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Cecil H. Whitley
@ ` Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Toby Fisher
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205231441550.2808-100000@frontdoor.g0ucu.fr eeserve.co.uk>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Octavian Rasnita @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
It would be great to have those games for the blind also.
In Windows, there are a lot of games, including a Doom for the blind named
Shades of Doom.
Teddy,
orasnita@home.ro
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cecil H. Whitley" <cwhitley@ec.rr.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: ACB
Hi,
I believe both doom and quake are available for linux. They are graphical
however just like their dos counterparts.
Cecil
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* Re: ACB
` ACB Cecil H. Whitley
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
@ ` Toby Fisher
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205231441550.2808-100000@frontdoor.g0ucu.fr eeserve.co.uk>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Toby Fisher @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Cecil H. Whitley wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe both doom and quake are available for linux. They are graphical
> however just like their dos counterparts.
Actually, I believe that Quake was originally written for Unix, though of
course I could be wrong.
Cheers.
--
Toby Fisher Email: toby@g0ucu.freeserve.co.uk
Tel.: +44(0)1480 417272 Mobile: +44(0)7974 363239
ICQ: #61744808
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205231441550.2808-100000@frontdoor.g0ucu.fr eeserve.co.uk>]
* Re: ACB
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Dave Hunt <
` ACB Cecil H. Whitley
@ ` Janina Sajka
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Janina Sajka @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Go and chess are simple? Tell that to Deep Blue.
\On Tue, 21 May 2002, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Some good games for DOS I know are Doom, Quake, Duke Nukem, Commandos and
> other strategy games. Are there any good games for Linux?
> I heard only about simple games like Go, chess, and other more simple than
> that.
> Not that I am a big fan of games, but it was about games.
> Teddy,
> orasnita@home.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cwhitley" <cwhitley@ec.rr.com>
> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: ACB
>
>
> Hi Deedra,
> remember memory management? Getting a dos machine networked with speech was
> anything but simple. Function for function Linux isn't any worse. I
> believe where you are seeing complexity is in the fact that there are many
> more functions available. I don't think linux is any worse than dos for the
> functions that were supported by dos. I.e. word processing, terminal
> emulation, email, what else did we use dos for???
>
> BTW, for the games question, nethack is available and configured correctly
> it uses curses in text mode. I think adom is also available for linux. The
> omega source code is out there as well. Get the idea that i'm into the d&d
> style games? I've also got c source code for a lot of the "bbs doors"
> programs from circa 1985-88, but they're on 5 1/4" and I no longer have a
> drive to read them with.... Lot of good that does eh?
>
> Regards,
>
> Cecil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
--
Janina Sajka, Director
Technology Research and Development
Governmental Relations Group
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
Chair, Accessibility SIG
Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
http://www.openebook.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
ACB cwhitley
` ACB Deedra Waters
` ACB Igor Gueths
ACB cwhitley
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Dave Hunt <
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Janina Sajka
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Patricia Logan
` ACB Gregory Nowak
` ACB Cecil H. Whitley
` ACB Octavian Rasnita
` ACB Toby Fisher
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205231441550.2808-100000@frontdoor.g0ucu.fr eeserve.co.uk>
` ACB Charles Crawford
` ACB Janina Sajka
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).