From: "John Heim" <jheim@math.wisc.edu>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:22:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <098001c7b8df$c4f0c640$4ba65c90@vv507j> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005601c7b84f$5bea08e0$c701a8c0@yellobow>
Well, I'm not sure of exactly what I said that you disagree with. Maybe you
can clarify that? I think you're reading more into my comments then was
actually there.
From: "Scott Berry" <sberry@northlc.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
> Right John,
>
> I agree but have to disagree too. I have started helping for the first
> time
> a site that I run software for my router off of. It is called
> www.xwrt.org
> they make a web interface for Wrt project which can be found at
> http://www.openwrt.org. But working for instance with a wiki is a bit of
> a
> trick. That seems to be about how 90% (percent) of the open source docs
> are
> kept. Now as for speakup, I do not use Speakup I do all admin chores
> remotely through a Windows computer which works fine for me. So as for
> Speakup I don't use it but like to keep current on it. I don't know how
> to
> program in Linux at all. I don't expect Kirk to do everything either but
> it
> is very good to voice. That might just be how the Speakup gets changed at
> some point. I myself would like to see Speakup in the kernel and user
> space
> we would have the best of both world.
>
> TTFN,
>
> Scott
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Heim" <jheim@math.wisc.edu>
> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Albert E. Sten-Clanton" <albert.e.sten_clanton@verizon.net>
>> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
>> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
>>
>>
>>>> I would ask people spouting off in this thread to ask themselves what
>>>> *they*
>>>> have contributed. It seems to me that a lot of people are making
>>>> suggestions
>>>> for what other people should do or sell.
>>>>
>>>> Say the best thing to do is to move speakup into user space. How is
>>>> that
>>>> going to get done? I guess we're all going to volunteer Kirk to do it.
>>>> Eh?
>>>
>>> You seem to be saying that the mere users should keep their traps shut
>>
>> I never said anything of the sort.
>>
>>>. In real life, a good majority of the people who use computers will
>>>know
>>>little or nothing about how to fix the problems that arise. Do you
>>>really
>>>propose that these people, such as my wife, have no business complaining
>>>or
>>>suggesting because they're not ultranerds?
>>
>> Well, sort of, yeah. Pointing out problems is one thing. Complaining is
>> another. And telling other people what they should do to solve your
>> problems
>> is yet another thing entirely.
>>
>> But anyway, my main point was to suggest that people ask themselves what
>> they've contributed to the open source community. Even if you're not a
>> coder, you can write documentation, maintain a web site, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 6/26/2007
>> 10:07 AM
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Keith Hinton
` Jan Buchal
` Doug Sutherland
` Gaijin
` Doug Sutherland
` C.M. Brannon
` Travis Siegel
` Glenn Ervin
` Doug Sutherland
` Gaijin
` Gregory Nowak
` Gaijin
` Doug Smith
` Doug Sutherland
` Gaijin
` Glenn Ervin
` Doug Sutherland
` Glenn Ervin
` Steve Holmes
[not found] ` <20070626042409.GA25331@cm.nu>
` Glenn Ervin
` John Heim
` Albert E. Sten-Clanton
` John Heim
` Glenn Ervin
` Scott Berry
` John Heim [this message]
` Scott Berry
` Albert E. Sten-Clanton
` Doug Sutherland
` Doug Sutherland
` Glenn Ervin
` John Heim
` Butch Bussen
` John Heim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='098001c7b8df$c4f0c640$4ba65c90@vv507j' \
--to=jheim@math.wisc.edu \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).