public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Heim" <jheim@math.wisc.edu>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:22:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <098001c7b8df$c4f0c640$4ba65c90@vv507j> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005601c7b84f$5bea08e0$c701a8c0@yellobow>

Well, I'm not sure of exactly what I said that you disagree with. Maybe you 
can clarify that? I think you're reading more into my comments then was 
actually there.


From: "Scott Berry" <sberry@northlc.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Software speech opinions


> Right John,
>
> I agree but have to disagree too.  I have started helping for the first 
> time
> a site that I run software for my router off of.  It is called 
> www.xwrt.org
> they make a web interface for Wrt project which can be found at
> http://www.openwrt.org.  But working for instance with a wiki is a bit of 
> a
> trick.  That seems to be about how 90% (percent) of the open source docs 
> are
> kept.  Now as for speakup, I do not use Speakup I do all admin chores
> remotely through a Windows computer which works fine for me.  So as for
> Speakup I don't use it but like to keep current on it.   I don't know how 
> to
> program in Linux at all.  I don't expect Kirk to do everything either but 
> it
> is very good to voice.  That might just be how the Speakup gets changed at
> some point.  I myself would like to see Speakup in the kernel and user 
> space
> we would have the best of both world.
>
> TTFN,
>
> Scott
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Heim" <jheim@math.wisc.edu>
> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." 
> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Albert E. Sten-Clanton" <albert.e.sten_clanton@verizon.net>
>> To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux."
>> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: Software speech opinions
>>
>>
>>>> I would ask people spouting off in this thread to ask themselves what
>>>> *they*
>>>> have contributed. It seems to me that a lot of people are making
>>>> suggestions
>>>> for what other people should do or sell.
>>>>
>>>> Say the best thing to do is to move speakup into user space. How is 
>>>> that
>>>> going to get done? I guess we're all going to volunteer Kirk to do it.
>>>> Eh?
>>>
>>> You seem to be saying that the mere users should keep their traps shut
>>
>> I never said anything of the sort.
>>
>>>.  In real life, a good majority of the people who use computers will 
>>>know
>>>little or nothing about how to fix the problems that arise.  Do you 
>>>really
>>>propose that these people, such as my wife, have no business complaining
>>>or
>>>suggesting because they're not ultranerds?
>>
>> Well, sort of, yeah. Pointing out problems is one thing. Complaining is
>> another. And telling other people what they should do to solve your
>> problems
>> is yet another thing entirely.
>>
>> But anyway, my main point was to suggest that people ask themselves what
>> they've contributed to the open source community. Even if you're not a
>> coder, you can write documentation, maintain a web site, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.9/870 - Release Date: 6/26/2007
>> 10:07 AM
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 Keith Hinton
 ` Jan Buchal
 ` Doug Sutherland
   ` Gaijin
     ` Doug Sutherland
       ` C.M. Brannon
         ` Travis Siegel
           ` Glenn Ervin
           ` Doug Sutherland
       ` Gaijin
         ` Gregory Nowak
           ` Gaijin
             ` Doug Smith
           ` Doug Sutherland
             ` Gaijin
           ` Glenn Ervin
             ` Doug Sutherland
               ` Glenn Ervin
                 ` Steve Holmes
     [not found]             ` <20070626042409.GA25331@cm.nu>
               ` Glenn Ervin
                 ` John Heim
                   ` Albert E. Sten-Clanton
                     ` John Heim
                       ` Glenn Ervin
                       ` Scott Berry
                         ` John Heim [this message]
                           ` Scott Berry
                       ` Albert E. Sten-Clanton
               ` Doug Sutherland
                 ` Doug Sutherland
                   ` Glenn Ervin
                 ` John Heim
                   ` Butch Bussen
               ` John Heim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='098001c7b8df$c4f0c640$4ba65c90@vv507j' \
    --to=jheim@math.wisc.edu \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).