From: "Victor Tsaran" <tsar@sylaba.poznan.pl>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Computer Science
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:01:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005c01c1cb94$217bbbc0$0100a8c0@cybertsar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0203140929000.40708-100000@server1.shellworld.net>
Amanda, you are right. I met a lot of so-called "hard coders" during my
studies at the university who thought that they could do everything.I
graduated just a year ago and at my university, Temple University in Philly,
Visual C++ was only a small fraction of the program. Mostly C, Assembly and
C++, but on Unix and VMS. We were given a chance to try Visual C on Win NT
platform, but only for comparison purposes. Now I think Java is overtaking
slowly.
Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Amanda Lee" <amanda@shellworld.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Computer Science
> Nope, Unix, Mainframes aren't standard anymore. The college grads we get
> these days at Verizon have no clue what Unix or Mainframes are all about.
> Everything is taught on a Windows-based Platform. I believe JAVA is
> taught, probably Visual Basic, Maybe sometimes C Language but usually C
> Plus Plus which was actually abandoned in the project I work on for
> straight C Language.
>
> I would think in the future though, there will be a change back to at
> least teaching Linux since it can run on a less expensive platform. It's
> pretty disgraceful how the content of Computer Sciences education has been
> degraded and these kids coming out have an ego bigger than life and think
> they can take on the World in a day!
>
> They really struggle when they can't understand how to program and the
> quality of code coming out is pretty awful. There is even this mentality
> in the Corporate World which indicates that one can learn everything they
> need to on the job and yet they can't figure out why there are so many
> problems with efficiency and the costs resulting from poor efficiency.
>
> Amanda Lee
>
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 jwantz@hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote:
>
> > Hi Chris,
> > I'm not going to get involved in the "bookshare wars', but since you
were
> > chastizing others on this list because most people use WINDOWS and not
> > linux, I think its only fair to point out that your computer science
> > department is very nonstandard. Though I am a meteorologist, not a
> > computer science person, I know many computer science students in the
past
> > and the present. Teaching WINDOWS programming is very nonstandard. I
> > would guess that at least 90 percent of the schools teach programming on
a
> > UNIX variant of some kind. In the past thre was a fair amount of people
> > using VMS. However, a lot of beginning C and C++ classes did use
> > Turbo/Borland. WINDOWS programming is much more difficult than UNIX
> > programming, so I suppose you are to be congratulated for making it
> > through such a tough curriculum.
> >
> > Jim Wantz
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
jwantz
` Amanda Lee
` Thomas Ward
` Johan Bergström
` Igor Gueths
` Richard Villa
` Amanda Lee
` Bruce Noblick
` Richard Villa
` Amanda Lee
` jwantz
` Igor Gueths
` Alex Snow
` jwantz
` jwantz
` Gregory Nowak
` Victor Tsaran [this message]
` Amanda Lee
` jwantz
` Amanda Lee
` jwantz
` Amanda Lee
` Brian Borowski
Ameenah Ghoston
` Amanda Lee
` Janina Sajka
computer science Saqib Shaikh
` jwantz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005c01c1cb94$217bbbc0$0100a8c0@cybertsar' \
--to=tsar@sylaba.poznan.pl \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).