* Re: Audio on CD RW
` Ron Marriage
@ ` Kirk Wood
` Victor Tsaran
` Victor Tsaran
` Steve Holmes
2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Kirk Wood @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Ron Marriage wrote:
> If you want to rewrite to a CD-RW then you must play it in
> the CD-RW drive or DVD drive to hear it. This would allow
> you to record, erase, re-record, etc. Still won't play on
> the stereo or any mini-player, but will work.
Actually, this is outdated information. Many stereos and diskman type CD
players now read CDRW disks. While I don't know any percentages, I will
say that it is very easy to find them advertising this ability.
Actually there is a simple reason. It is cheaper to produce a higher
number of the same laser needed to read the CDRW disks then it would be to
produce smaller numbers of two different laser diodes.
As another note, to erase anything on a CDRW you must "reformat" the
disk. You can not simply erase a single track and rewrite it. You must
erase all or nothing. This being said, when using either CDR or CDRW for
data you can "overwrite" the file. What really happens is another copy of
the file is written while leaving the first in place. The pointers are
then updated to show the new location. This is part of the multiwrite
specification.
=======
Kirk Wood
Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net
Nowlan's Theory:
He who hesitates is not only lost, but several miles from
the next freeway exit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Audio on CD RW
` Kirk Wood
@ ` Victor Tsaran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Victor Tsaran @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi, Kirk!
Will try to search on the Internet for brands of CD RW's that will play in
my diskman, at least.
thanks,
Vic
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Wood" <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:20 AM
Subject: Re: Audio on CD RW
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Ron Marriage wrote:
> If you want to rewrite to a CD-RW then you must play it in
> the CD-RW drive or DVD drive to hear it. This would allow
> you to record, erase, re-record, etc. Still won't play on
> the stereo or any mini-player, but will work.
Actually, this is outdated information. Many stereos and diskman type CD
players now read CDRW disks. While I don't know any percentages, I will
say that it is very easy to find them advertising this ability.
Actually there is a simple reason. It is cheaper to produce a higher
number of the same laser needed to read the CDRW disks then it would be to
produce smaller numbers of two different laser diodes.
As another note, to erase anything on a CDRW you must "reformat" the
disk. You can not simply erase a single track and rewrite it. You must
erase all or nothing. This being said, when using either CDR or CDRW for
data you can "overwrite" the file. What really happens is another copy of
the file is written while leaving the first in place. The pointers are
then updated to show the new location. This is part of the multiwrite
specification.
=======
Kirk Wood
Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net
Nowlan's Theory:
He who hesitates is not only lost, but several miles from
the next freeway exit.
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Audio on CD RW
` Ron Marriage
` Kirk Wood
@ ` Victor Tsaran
` Steve Holmes
2 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Victor Tsaran @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Yes, but I also know that only the first session from the multisession CD
will play on home stereo.
Victor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Marriage" <marriage@seidata.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: Audio on CD RW
If someone has already said this, please forgive me.
Recording audio
CD-RW will play on only multiple use CDROMs such as a DVD or
CD-RW drive.
CD-R will play in an audio player or multiple use CD drive.
If you want to record music on a CD-R you can do that, if
you don't close or finish the CD-R then you can go back in
and add more to it later. Once you close or finish the CD-R
you cannot write anymore to it again.
If you want to rewrite to a CD-RW then you must play it in
the CD-RW drive or DVD drive to hear it. This would allow
you to record, erase, re-record, etc. Still won't play on
the stereo or any mini-player, but will work.
Ron
Kerry Hoath wrote:
>
> The newer the cd player the more likely it will read cdrw.
> Many new diskmans will do cdrw so you could patch in the diskman into the
mixer;
> or similar. Some of those cheap mp3cd diskmans also do cdrw and also do
audio cd on cdrw.
>
> Regards, Kerry.
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> > Hi, Kerry!
> > Thanks a lot for your explanation. I tried already two CD RW's of
different
> > brands, but no luck. This is quite unfortunate because I was hoping that
I
> > could record, use the CD for my rehearsals and rewrite multiple times.
> > Best,
> > Victor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
> --
> Kerry Hoath: kerry@gotss.net kerry@gotss.eu.org or
kerry@gotss.spice.net.au
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
--
Ron Marriage
Homepage http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/
Email mailto:marriage@seidata.com
Linux User Group http://www.seidata.com/~seilug/
Blind Links http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/rblind.html
Win door prizes! Meet old and new friends! See the latest
technology and gadgets for your everyday living! Learn how
the NFB is helping to knock down barriers to make your life
better! All this and more at the 2002 NFB National
Convention
July 3 - 9 -- for details go to: http://www.nfbk.org
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Audio on CD RW
` Ron Marriage
` Kirk Wood
` Victor Tsaran
@ ` Steve Holmes
` Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux? Charles Crawford
2 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Steve Holmes @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I don't find the following message to be true. I have a couple CD players
that will play audio CD's recorded on a CDRW media - I've done it!. Like
what was said in a previous message, it really depends on the player
itself as well as the media. I've played them on a couple players but
I've also seen it fail on many others. I think the newer the player, the
better your chances. Also stick to better quality media. The cheapest CD
and CDRW blanks will give you the worst time.
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Ron Marriage wrote:
> If someone has already said this, please forgive me.
> Recording audio
> CD-RW will play on only multiple use CDROMs such as a DVD or
> CD-RW drive.
> CD-R will play in an audio player or multiple use CD drive.
>
> If you want to record music on a CD-R you can do that, if
> you don't close or finish the CD-R then you can go back in
> and add more to it later. Once you close or finish the CD-R
> you cannot write anymore to it again.
>
> If you want to rewrite to a CD-RW then you must play it in
> the CD-RW drive or DVD drive to hear it. This would allow
> you to record, erase, re-record, etc. Still won't play on
> the stereo or any mini-player, but will work.
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> Kerry Hoath wrote:
> >
> > The newer the cd player the more likely it will read cdrw.
> > Many new diskmans will do cdrw so you could patch in the diskman into the mixer;
> > or similar. Some of those cheap mp3cd diskmans also do cdrw and also do audio cd on cdrw.
> >
> > Regards, Kerry.
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Victor Tsaran wrote:
> > > Hi, Kerry!
> > > Thanks a lot for your explanation. I tried already two CD RW's of different
> > > brands, but no luck. This is quite unfortunate because I was hoping that I
> > > could record, use the CD for my rehearsals and rewrite multiple times.
> > > Best,
> > > Victor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Kerry Hoath: kerry@gotss.net kerry@gotss.eu.org or kerry@gotss.spice.net.au
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> --
> Ron Marriage
> Homepage http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/
> Email mailto:marriage@seidata.com
> Linux User Group http://www.seidata.com/~seilug/
> Blind Links http://www.seidata.com/~marriage/rblind.html
>
> Win door prizes! Meet old and new friends! See the latest
> technology and gadgets for your everyday living! Learn how
> the NFB is helping to knock down barriers to make your life
> better! All this and more at the 2002 NFB National
> Convention
> July 3 - 9 -- for details go to: http://www.nfbk.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Steve Holmes
@ ` Charles Crawford
` Thomas Ward
` Steve Holmes
0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Charles Crawford @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi All,
Took me a few months to get to collecting all the code, but I remember
some folks were interested in getting the original prg files from the
Talking Checkbook tht was compile with Clipper for Dos. Now anyone want
it? I can send a zip file of the programs.
-- charlie.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux? Charles Crawford
@ ` Thomas Ward
` Steve Holmes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Ward @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Hi, I'd like to take a peek at it. Would you mind sending it to me at
tward@bright.net
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Crawford <ccrawford@acb.org>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
> Hi All,
>
> Took me a few months to get to collecting all the code, but I remember
> some folks were interested in getting the original prg files from the
> Talking Checkbook tht was compile with Clipper for Dos. Now anyone want
> it? I can send a zip file of the programs.
>
> -- charlie.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux? Charles Crawford
` Thomas Ward
@ ` Steve Holmes
` charles crawford
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Steve Holmes @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I think you sent me some of those in the past; I don't remember if I kept
them or not. I am interested still in a checkbook project but am
considering looking into gnu checks when I get rolling on it. I'm really
curious about putting a text based front end on an X application.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Charles Crawford wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Took me a few months to get to collecting all the code, but I remember
> some folks were interested in getting the original prg files from the
> Talking Checkbook tht was compile with Clipper for Dos. Now anyone want
> it? I can send a zip file of the programs.
>
> -- charlie.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Steve Holmes
@ ` charles crawford
` David Poehlman
` Janina Sajka
0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: charles crawford @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I found it interesting to hear about putting a text based front
end to an X application. Sounds alot like Windows. It would be a real
problem if we are to be forced into having to re-write programs to make
them text based.
-- Charlie.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` charles crawford
@ ` David Poehlman
` Charles Crawford
` Janina Sajka
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: David Poehlman @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
but it is much easier to do this for linux than for windows from what
I've heard.
----- Original Message -----
From: "charles crawford" <ccrawford@acb.org>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
I found it interesting to hear about putting a text based front
end to an X application. Sounds alot like Windows. It would be a real
problem if we are to be forced into having to re-write programs to make
them text based.
-- Charlie.
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` David Poehlman
@ ` Charles Crawford
` Janina Sajka
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Charles Crawford @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Dave and all,
I suspect that it would be easier to recompile the talking
cvheckbook as long as there is a compiler in Linux that reads the dos text
programs associated with Clipper and can import the terminal emulation that
sends text to the screen in a way a screen reader can capture it on it's
way. I am not sure that the terminal piece to the code is all that
important in this case because we only added it to del with the direct
screen writes that Clipper wanted to do. The other problem would be the
dbf database file. It is standard, bjt not sure if it can be read in
Linux? Probably can, but let's see how the compile works. Who knows,
maybe all the old talking checkbook user will go to Linux to use it.
Not to be fat headed, but I still have not found anything in
Windows tht can compete witht he speed and ease of use of the talking
checkbook.
-- charlie.
At 07:06 AM 2/7/02 -0500, you wrote:
>but it is much easier to do this for linux than for windows from what
>I've heard.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "charles crawford" <ccrawford@acb.org>
>To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
>Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:07 AM
>Subject: Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
>
>
>I found it interesting to hear about putting a text based front
>end to an X application. Sounds alot like Windows. It would be a real
>problem if we are to be forced into having to re-write programs to make
>them text based.
>
>-- Charlie.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Charles Crawford
@ ` Janina Sajka
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202071014070.3364-100000@toccata.rednote.ne t>
` Amanda Lee
2 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Janina Sajka @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
I took a quick look on Fresh Meat and found several tools that might
expedite porting Charley's checkbook to linux. Thing is, if the tools
work, they'd also port to Windows. So, how's about that?
--
Janina Sajka, Director
Technology Research and Development
Governmental Relations Group
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
Chair, Accessibility SIG
Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
http://www.openebook.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202071014070.3364-100000@toccata.rednote.ne t>]
* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` Charles Crawford
` Janina Sajka
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202071014070.3364-100000@toccata.rednote.ne t>
@ ` Amanda Lee
2 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Amanda Lee @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
It probably would not be difficult to translate the data files from a
delimited dbf type of file to whatever is compatible to how it is
eventually compiled in LInux. I seem to recall that .dbf files just have
a semicolon to delimit each field. Not an expert but it can happen!
I'm behind in the mail so perhaps the checkbook is now already
circumnavigating the globe hahah!
Amanda Lee
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Charles Crawford wrote:
> Dave and all,
>
> I suspect that it would be easier to recompile the talking
> cvheckbook as long as there is a compiler in Linux that reads the dos text
> programs associated with Clipper and can import the terminal emulation that
> sends text to the screen in a way a screen reader can capture it on it's
> way. I am not sure that the terminal piece to the code is all that
> important in this case because we only added it to del with the direct
> screen writes that Clipper wanted to do. The other problem would be the
> dbf database file. It is standard, bjt not sure if it can be read in
> Linux? Probably can, but let's see how the compile works. Who knows,
> maybe all the old talking checkbook user will go to Linux to use it.
>
> Not to be fat headed, but I still have not found anything in
> Windows tht can compete witht he speed and ease of use of the talking
> checkbook.
>
> -- charlie.
> At 07:06 AM 2/7/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >but it is much easier to do this for linux than for windows from what
> >I've heard.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "charles crawford" <ccrawford@acb.org>
> >To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> >Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:07 AM
> >Subject: Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
> >
> >
> >I found it interesting to hear about putting a text based front
> >end to an X application. Sounds alot like Windows. It would be a real
> >problem if we are to be forced into having to re-write programs to make
> >them text based.
> >
> >-- Charlie.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Speakup mailing list
> >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Speakup mailing list
> >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: Who wants to compile the talking checkbook code for Linux?
` charles crawford
` David Poehlman
@ ` Janina Sajka
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Janina Sajka @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: speakup
Charley:
It's not the same at all. Unlike Windows, X, and unix apps in general, are
socketed and therefore rather modular. A useful way to think of this might
be to remember the bad old days of nonsocketed telephones, when you needed
a guy with pliers and a drill to install an extension telephone upstairs.
Of course, there's still a need for that guy at some point today. The
difference is that today that guy installs an RJ11 jack, and your phone,
therefore, is not hard-wired, but scketed. Big difference.
On Thu, 7 Feb
2002, charles crawford wrote:
> I found it interesting to hear about putting a text based front
> end to an X application. Sounds alot like Windows. It would be a real
> problem if we are to be forced into having to re-write programs to make
> them text based.
>
> -- Charlie.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
--
Janina Sajka, Director
Technology Research and Development
Governmental Relations Group
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
Chair, Accessibility SIG
Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
http://www.openebook.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread