From: Igor Gueths <igueths@attbi.com>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: kernel vs. alsa?
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:13:41 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204210912570.232-100000@igueths> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204212138250.4039-100000@borg.goanna.net.au>
Hi Shaun. But won't the timing issue come into play once it is integrated
in the next kernel tree? Unless you compile it as a module, I might be
able to see the above problem happening.
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Shaun Oliver wrote:
> the reason people like alsa is because alsa is userspace and handles only
> sound.
> the kernel drivers have to fight fortiming and as a result sometimes place
> unecissary load on the system.
> hth
>
>
> --
> Shaun
>
> If little else, the brain is an educational toy.
> -- Tom Robbins
> EMAIL: shauno@goanna.net.au
> ICQ: 76958435
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Igor Gueths wrote:
>
> > Hi all. I am having pretty bad luck getting beta11 of the alsa package to
> > work. Beta9 work well with some quirks. I wonder what has so drastically
> > changed in beta11 that makes it so much harder to get working? Anyway, my
> > question is why does everyone like the alsa drivers better than the oss
> > modules? One thing that I've heard is that the oss modules don't use full
> > duplex. Is this correct? The only reason why I ask is because I am
> > considering switching from alsa to the 2.4.18 sound modules to hopefully
> > fix my problem with not being able to play wavs with trplayer.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Igor Gueths
` Cheryl Homiak
` Gregory Nowak
` Shaun Oliver
` Igor Gueths [this message]
` Shaun Oliver
` Cheryl Homiak
` Cheryl Homiak
` Gregory Nowak
` Toby Fisher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0204210912570.232-100000@igueths \
--to=igueths@attbi.com \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).