public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rfc: location of the speakup users guide
@  William Hubbs
   ` Littlefield, Tyler
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @  UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: speakup mailing list

All,

I don't know for sure how I want to do this, so I want to run it by the
rest of you to see what you think.

Currently, we have the speakup users guide located in the staging
directory, which means that it shows up in the linux kernel source tree.
We can't put it in the Documentation directory of the kernel until it
goes fully mainline (out of staging).

So, I'm wondering what you think about where it is located now.  Should
it be in the staging directory where it is, or, should we move it, e.g.
to the speakup-tools repository?

Comments?

Thanks,

William


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: rfc: location of the speakup users guide
   rfc: location of the speakup users guide William Hubbs
@  ` Littlefield, Tyler
   ` Zachary Kline
   ` Stephen Dawes
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Littlefield, Tyler @  UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.

Speaking of staging, I notice the newest git doesn't have makefiles for 
compiling as a stand-alone module set. Are we all being quietly forced 
into messing with the kernel? Any hopes of getting back the module 
process? It seems we went from patching it into the kernel, to 
stand-alone modules, and now we're back to the installing it into the 
kernel again. I like both ways, but I use the modules on systems I want 
to just get up and running fast, especially when I don't care to sit 
down and compile a kernel.
On 12/5/2010 4:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I don't know for sure how I want to do this, so I want to run it by the
> rest of you to see what you think.
>
> Currently, we have the speakup users guide located in the staging
> directory, which means that it shows up in the linux kernel source tree.
> We can't put it in the Documentation directory of the kernel until it
> goes fully mainline (out of staging).
>
> So, I'm wondering what you think about where it is located now.  Should
> it be in the staging directory where it is, or, should we move it, e.g.
> to the speakup-tools repository?
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>


-- 

Thanks,
Ty


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: rfc: location of the speakup users guide
   rfc: location of the speakup users guide William Hubbs
   ` Littlefield, Tyler
@  ` Zachary Kline
   ` Stephen Dawes
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zachary Kline @  UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.

Hi William,
Keep it where it is.  It applies to Speakup, and I think moving it 
elsewhere would just confuse the issue.  It will, ideally, be integrated 
into the main tree at some point, so why move it now?
Just my two cents.
Best,
Zack


On Sun, 5 Dec 2010, William Hubbs wrote:

> All,
>
> I don't know for sure how I want to do this, so I want to run it by the
> rest of you to see what you think.
>
> Currently, we have the speakup users guide located in the staging
> directory, which means that it shows up in the linux kernel source tree.
> We can't put it in the Documentation directory of the kernel until it
> goes fully mainline (out of staging).
>
> So, I'm wondering what you think about where it is located now.  Should
> it be in the staging directory where it is, or, should we move it, e.g.
> to the speakup-tools repository?
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: location of the speakup users guide
   rfc: location of the speakup users guide William Hubbs
   ` Littlefield, Tyler
   ` Zachary Kline
@  ` Stephen Dawes
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Dawes @  UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'

Shouldn't it reside in a speakupdocs branch of the speakup tree? I don't
think that code and documentation belong in the same branch. If this is not
acceptable, follow the kernel documentation structure. 

-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of William Hubbs
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 4:54 PM
To: speakup mailing list
Subject: rfc: location of the speakup users guide

All,

I don't know for sure how I want to do this, so I want to run it by the rest
of you to see what you think.

Currently, we have the speakup users guide located in the staging directory,
which means that it shows up in the linux kernel source tree.
We can't put it in the Documentation directory of the kernel until it goes
fully mainline (out of staging).

So, I'm wondering what you think about where it is located now.  Should it
be in the staging directory where it is, or, should we move it, e.g.
to the speakup-tools repository?

Comments?

Thanks,

William

_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
 rfc: location of the speakup users guide William Hubbs
 ` Littlefield, Tyler
 ` Zachary Kline
 ` Stephen Dawes

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).