* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
rfc: speakup supported kernels William Hubbs
@ ` Bill Cox
` Samuel Thibault
` Trevor Saunders
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bill Cox @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
I guess I'm more worried about speakup not being supported in trunk of
the current mainline kernel, nor in Ubuntu Maverick's current kernel.
Should we say speakup only supports kernels prior to some number?
Bill
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:37 PM, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> our documentation states that speakup supports kernels 2.6.18 and later.
> I doubt that this is correct any longer, so I wanted to bring this to
> the list and figure out which versions of the kernel we want to try to
> support.
>
> I would suggest 2.6.26 and later, because from that point on if someone
> wants to build speakup into the kernel, we modify the build system to do
> that, but we do not change any of the kernel source itself.
>
> Does anyone know if kernel versions older than 2.6.26 are being used
> these days? Do we still need speakup support for those older kernels?
>
> Any input on this would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks much,
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
` Bill Cox
@ ` Samuel Thibault
` Bill Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Bill Cox, le Thu 24 Jun 2010 15:57:16 -0400, a écrit :
> I guess I'm more worried about speakup not being supported in trunk of
> the current mainline kernel, nor in Ubuntu Maverick's current kernel.
This is already being worked on.
Samuel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
` Samuel Thibault
@ ` Bill Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bill Cox @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> Bill Cox, le Thu 24 Jun 2010 15:57:16 -0400, a écrit :
>> I guess I'm more worried about speakup not being supported in trunk of
>> the current mainline kernel, nor in Ubuntu Maverick's current kernel.
>
> This is already being worked on.
Sweet! Please post when something is working. I'll start testing it
in Ubuntu Maverick.
Bill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
rfc: speakup supported kernels William Hubbs
` Bill Cox
@ ` Trevor Saunders
` Igor Gueths
` Trevor Astrope
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Saunders @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Hi,
Only kernels numbered less than 2.6.26 that I know of in use are the rhel 26.18 and 26.9, which iirc don't work with speakup anyway. so 2.6.26 seems reasonable.
Trev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
rfc: speakup supported kernels William Hubbs
` Bill Cox
` Trevor Saunders
@ ` Igor Gueths
` Trevor Astrope
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Igor Gueths @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi. 2.6.26 should be fine, although my server here still runs 2.6.19.2. I'm not
physically at the machine most of the time, and in very few instances need to
pull out the Dec Express to fix some problem or other.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:37:03PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> our documentation states that speakup supports kernels 2.6.18 and later.
> I doubt that this is correct any longer, so I wanted to bring this to
> the list and figure out which versions of the kernel we want to try to
> support.
>
> I would suggest 2.6.26 and later, because from that point on if someone
> wants to build speakup into the kernel, we modify the build system to do
> that, but we do not change any of the kernel source itself.
>
> Does anyone know if kernel versions older than 2.6.26 are being used
> these days? Do we still need speakup support for those older kernels?
>
> Any input on this would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks much,
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
- --
Igor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)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=pXKD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
rfc: speakup supported kernels William Hubbs
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
` Igor Gueths
@ ` Trevor Astrope
` Samuel Thibault
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Trevor Astrope @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Kernels older than 2.6.26 definitely don't work with current speakup, as
speakup only supports the newer kobject implementation.
Rhel/Centos 5 use a modified 2.6.18 kernel. As it stands, these
distributions aren't supported. Personally, I use a stable distro such as
these, as I just like to have a stable working system that is low
maintenance. I upgrade my os wehn I upgrade my hardware, which is about
every 5 years. Rhel/centos is also popular in enterprise environments.
I don't think it is necessary to support the older kernels with new
speakup versions, but it would be nice if an older speakup release that
did work with these kernels would still be available. That is the downside
to using git and not releasing stable versions.
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> our documentation states that speakup supports kernels 2.6.18 and later.
> I doubt that this is correct any longer, so I wanted to bring this to
> the list and figure out which versions of the kernel we want to try to
> support.
>
> I would suggest 2.6.26 and later, because from that point on if someone
> wants to build speakup into the kernel, we modify the build system to do
> that, but we do not change any of the kernel source itself.
>
> Does anyone know if kernel versions older than 2.6.26 are being used
> these days? Do we still need speakup support for those older kernels?
>
> Any input on this would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks much,
>
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: rfc: speakup supported kernels
` Trevor Astrope
@ ` Samuel Thibault
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Thibault @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Trevor Astrope, le Thu 24 Jun 2010 17:00:55 -0400, a écrit :
> I don't think it is necessary to support the older kernels with new
> speakup versions, but it would be nice if an older speakup release that
> did work with these kernels would still be available. That is the downside
> to using git and not releasing stable versions.
?!
stable versions do exist, and are tagged in git, starting from v3.0.2.
Samuel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread