From: "Laura Eaves" <leaves1@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: An Accessible Adobe Reader for Linux
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:29:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03ea01c4f82c$fe6d9360$6601a8c0@geekspeak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111215858.GW790@rednote.net>
Yes, linux and unix have always been more accessible because they are not
GUI, and I assume the console is text based and not graphical -- or am I
wrong? the last time I used a unix/linux system was in the mid 90s and most
all work was done command-line. I have joined this list as I am getting a
second pc in order to install and use linux for various reasons, and I want
to check out all the accessibility advancements since I moved to a windows
environment.
But just as sighted linux users dismiss the console interface, as you say, I
think it is equally inappropriate for a blind user to completely ignore the
GNOME GUI approach, and trying to make it accessible, as running a GUI
actually is a little more than just a bunch of icons covering up the same
operations -- the whole underpinning is implemented in an even-driven manner
and there is a different way of thinking of things -- well actually I
rejected GUI's for a very long time at work because I still had enough sight
to use screen mag for work, and could not use the GUI stuff when it reared
its ugly head... but after I lost my reading vision and switched to
windows -- partly to get experienced using speech and partly because I was
curious about its accessibility, I have actually gotten to like some of its
aspects, and can see that if made accessible, it is actually rather nice.
But I still miss unix extremely, and the flexibility, and the power of
things and clean way it handles system operations compared with windows...
Sorry I didn't mean to get off on this thread -- I guess I just wanted to
make the point that I am glad for the diversion I made into GUI apps and am
actually glad (if you can believe it) that I lost my vision in order to
force me to stop depending on it, and with my programming background I think
GUI programs can be very useful and accessible.
But there has to be a way to access the same functionality from the gui --
to get back to command line when necessary, query for available commands and
docs, run scripts, etc. That is possible in windows but so much more
awkward! It is truely a straight jacket compared to linux.
Take care and I have enjoyed lurking on this list. I am learning a lot
about speakup, which is why I joined.
Take care.
--le
----- Original Message -----
From: "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: An Accessible Adobe Reader for Linux
Linux accessibility, at least for users who are blind, is far more
impressive on the console. In fact, it's extremely impressive on the
console rivaling, and even surpassing, many things that users of
expensive proprietary-ware applications have. The biggest thing wrong
with the console is in fact the very negative and dismissive attitude
that many GUI people seem to have of it.
Chris Gray writes:
> At best, MSAA mode was little more than a bandage. Let's hope that
> something more positive can come out of Longhorn. One of the primary
> reasons I am setting up a Linux box is to check out Gnome; what I've
> seen so far of its access is quite impressive though it has a ways to
> go for certain.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
--
Janina Sajka Phone: +1.202.494.7040
Partner, Capital Accessibility LLC http://www.CapitalAccessibility.Com
Chair, Accessibility Workgroup Free Standards Group (FSG)
janina@freestandards.org http://a11y.org
If Linux can't solve your computing problem, you need a different problem.
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Dawes, Stephen
` Gregory Nowak
` Laura Eaves
` Janina Sajka
` Laura Eaves
` Janina Sajka
` Chris Gray
` unsubscribe! Outside Touch
` unsubscribe! Luke Yelavich
` An Accessible Adobe Reader for Linux Janina Sajka
` Laura Eaves [this message]
` Janina Sajka
` Adam Myrow
` Sean McMahon
` Sean McMahon
` Gregory Nowak
` Sean McMahon
` Gregory Nowak
` Janina Sajka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
Laura Eaves
` Janina Sajka
` Kenny Hitt
` Janina Sajka
Dawes, Stephen
Janina Sajka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03ea01c4f82c$fe6d9360$6601a8c0@geekspeak' \
--to=leaves1@carolina.rr.com \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).