From: Jason <unleet@qwest.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: Loadlin question
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:02:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01112717023700.24380@lightstar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111271832500.285-100000@rocki.nycap.rr.com>
AFAIK no, there's no difference.
they both kick out the BIOS and any "real-mode" programs that are running,
the only difference is the method used, LILO uses native code and a few BIOS
vectors, loadlin uses VCPI.
On Tuesday November 27, 2001 04:34 pm, you wrote:
> Hi.
> Is there
> any difference in system resource availability if I load Linux from a dos
> prompt as oposed to loading Linux right from the Lilo prompt?
> Just curious.
> Later
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Dan Murphy
` Jason [this message]
` Dan Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01112717023700.24380@lightstar \
--to=unleet@qwest.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).