public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Glenn Ervin at Home" <GlennErvin@cableone.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: A good synth?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:10:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <009e01c46dfe$c7292620$7700a8c0@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040719214147.GA5769@lnx2.holmesgrown.com>

I use a Double Talk once a while at work, when none other is around, but I
think it is pretty bad.
It does enunciate well, but the sound just bugs me.
Actually, I prefer an Artic, or external artic notetaker better than double
talk.
But most people like the DecTalk best.
Glenn

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Holmes" <steve@holmesgrown.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: A good synth?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey no! I don't personally own a Double Talk but when I've heard them
in the past, they began to grow on me.  Personally, I use a Speakout
from GW Micro but first of all and very unfortunately they have
stopped production as with so many hardware synths and second, when
they were sold, they went for something like $695 or so.  It is/was a
very fast and pretty easy to understand at those high speeds and best
of all, it does *NOT* force abbreviations down your throat like so
many of the software synths do.  I want to hear it say "M N" not
Minisota!!!"; ever heard of Sunday Micro Systems:)?

The worst synth I think I ever heard was a Type & Talk or possibly a
votrax and the old Echo from Street Electronics was another bad one.
At least the Echo was dirt cheap - something like $100.

I think the Accents sound pretty good and you can wind them up to be
pretty fast and you can still understand them once you're used to its
speech quality.  Again, they aren't made any more either.  I one an
Accent PC and it still works good but the SA model I also have just up
and died for no reason last year.  I hadn't had it for any more than a
year before it just up and quit so I wonder about the quality of Acent
synths in general.  My Speakout has been used a lot for something like
7 years now and I've carried it around places, replaced the internal
battery twice and I only had one incident of breakage in that whole
period.  I sure wish more hardware synths would be built.  Thank God
the Double Talk is still around.  The Tripple Talk is another option
but I don't think progress has been made yet concerning the driver for
Speakup to talk to it.  This would present another hardware synth
option.  I still feel that hardware synths are far more responsive
than any software thingy out there Software synths are nice for
portability and possibly economy but that's about it.

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:
> Are you serious? Wow, I thought DoubleTalk had to be the worst one
> ever....that's sad that hardware synths are so bad....
>
> Thanks for your reply
>
> Take care,
> Sina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca
[mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca]
> On Behalf Of nick G
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:32 AM
> To: sbahram@nc.rr.com; Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
> Subject: Re: A good synth?
>
>
> That's as good as it gets.  Doubletalk is second only to dectalk in the
> hardware arena in my opinion. Thanks, Nick
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@nc.rr.com>
> To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'"
> <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:05 AM
> Subject: A good synth?
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I need a good hardware synth. My employer is willing to spend around
> > 300 bucks or so....I need it to work with a variety of linux apps,
> > like
> SpeakUP
> > for sure, and possibly EmacSpeak as well. Also anything else that uses
> > a hardware synth if that's possible.
> >
> > What's a good one people? In my opinion the DoubleTalk's quality is
> > just
> > *shutter* but if that's the best for that price range, I guess I'll have
> to
> > go with that.
> >
> > Thank you all for any replies.
> >
> > Take care,
> > Sina
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>

- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA/EAVWSjv55S0LfERAvL4AKCkn/e3nje8iLaR8Y/mw05Se6aSFwCg84Fe
uhttL2TLOBk2zEctLPbh2TE=
=fjD7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup



  parent reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 downloading current page in lynx the cat Gregory Nowak
 ` Cheryl Homiak
 ` Jim Danley
   ` Gregory Nowak
   ` Cheryl Homiak
 ` Ari Moisio
   ` Gregory Nowak
     ` Cheryl Homiak
       ` A good synth? Sina Bahram
         ` nick G
           ` Sina Bahram
             ` Will Smith
               ` Sina Bahram
                 ` Gregory Nowak
                   ` Glenn Ervin at Home
                 ` Erik Heil
               ` Glenn Ervin at Home
             ` Gregory Nowak
               ` nick G
             ` Steve Holmes
               ` Jayson Smith
               ` Glenn Ervin at Home [this message]
         ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Glenn Ervin at Home
           ` Jayson Smith
 ` downloading current page in lynx the cat Ralph W. Reid
 Fw: A good synth? Glenn Ervin at Home
 ` Sina Bahram
   ` Jayson Smith
     ` Sina Bahram
     ` Luke Davis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='009e01c46dfe$c7292620$7700a8c0@desktop' \
    --to=glennervin@cableone.net \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).