From: "Jayson Smith" <ratguy@bellsouth.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: A good synth?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:22:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006501c46def$b4769c60$6500a8c0@h2c8f0> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040719214147.GA5769@lnx2.holmesgrown.com>
Heh. I have a soft spot in my heart for the Echo, simply because that was
what I used on our old Apple computers for so many years! So I got pretty
used to the sound.
Jayson.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Holmes" <steve@holmesgrown.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: A good synth?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey no! I don't personally own a Double Talk but when I've heard them
> in the past, they began to grow on me. Personally, I use a Speakout
> from GW Micro but first of all and very unfortunately they have
> stopped production as with so many hardware synths and second, when
> they were sold, they went for something like $695 or so. It is/was a
> very fast and pretty easy to understand at those high speeds and best
> of all, it does *NOT* force abbreviations down your throat like so
> many of the software synths do. I want to hear it say "M N" not
> Minisota!!!"; ever heard of Sunday Micro Systems:)?
>
> The worst synth I think I ever heard was a Type & Talk or possibly a
> votrax and the old Echo from Street Electronics was another bad one.
> At least the Echo was dirt cheap - something like $100.
>
> I think the Accents sound pretty good and you can wind them up to be
> pretty fast and you can still understand them once you're used to its
> speech quality. Again, they aren't made any more either. I one an
> Accent PC and it still works good but the SA model I also have just up
> and died for no reason last year. I hadn't had it for any more than a
> year before it just up and quit so I wonder about the quality of Acent
> synths in general. My Speakout has been used a lot for something like
> 7 years now and I've carried it around places, replaced the internal
> battery twice and I only had one incident of breakage in that whole
> period. I sure wish more hardware synths would be built. Thank God
> the Double Talk is still around. The Tripple Talk is another option
> but I don't think progress has been made yet concerning the driver for
> Speakup to talk to it. This would present another hardware synth
> option. I still feel that hardware synths are far more responsive
> than any software thingy out there Software synths are nice for
> portability and possibly economy but that's about it.
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:
> > Are you serious? Wow, I thought DoubleTalk had to be the worst one
> > ever....that's sad that hardware synths are so bad....
> >
> > Thanks for your reply
> >
> > Take care,
> > Sina
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca
[mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca]
> > On Behalf Of nick G
> > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:32 AM
> > To: sbahram@nc.rr.com; Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
> > Subject: Re: A good synth?
> >
> >
> > That's as good as it gets. Doubletalk is second only to dectalk in the
> > hardware arena in my opinion. Thanks, Nick
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@nc.rr.com>
> > To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'"
> > <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:05 AM
> > Subject: A good synth?
> >
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I need a good hardware synth. My employer is willing to spend around
> > > 300 bucks or so....I need it to work with a variety of linux apps,
> > > like
> > SpeakUP
> > > for sure, and possibly EmacSpeak as well. Also anything else that uses
> > > a hardware synth if that's possible.
> > >
> > > What's a good one people? In my opinion the DoubleTalk's quality is
> > > just
> > > *shutter* but if that's the best for that price range, I guess I'll
have
> > to
> > > go with that.
> > >
> > > Thank you all for any replies.
> > >
> > > Take care,
> > > Sina
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
>
> - --
> HolmesGrown Solutions
> The best solutions for the best price!
> http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFA/EAVWSjv55S0LfERAvL4AKCkn/e3nje8iLaR8Y/mw05Se6aSFwCg84Fe
> uhttL2TLOBk2zEctLPbh2TE=
> =fjD7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
downloading current page in lynx the cat Gregory Nowak
` Cheryl Homiak
` Jim Danley
` Gregory Nowak
` Cheryl Homiak
` Ari Moisio
` Gregory Nowak
` Cheryl Homiak
` A good synth? Sina Bahram
` nick G
` Sina Bahram
` Will Smith
` Sina Bahram
` Gregory Nowak
` Glenn Ervin at Home
` Erik Heil
` Glenn Ervin at Home
` Gregory Nowak
` nick G
` Steve Holmes
` Jayson Smith [this message]
` Glenn Ervin at Home
` Gregory Nowak
` Glenn Ervin at Home
` Jayson Smith
` downloading current page in lynx the cat Ralph W. Reid
Fw: A good synth? Glenn Ervin at Home
` Sina Bahram
` Jayson Smith
` Sina Bahram
` Luke Davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006501c46def$b4769c60$6500a8c0@h2c8f0' \
--to=ratguy@bellsouth.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).