* questions about split version of zipspeak @ tony seth ` From Glenn Ervinat home. 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: tony seth @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup Hi all. I accidentally posted my question via another email address, ooops, anyway, here's the question again. I tried installing the split version of zipspeak on a dos only system, dos 6.22 but when I used pkunzip to unzip it with the -d switch, instead of unzipping nicely to the linux directory with subdirectories, it did that, and as well, dumped several files in the root directory. I thought I did it right, but now I know AI either didn't or something happened that shouldn't have. I used the -d switch on all 22 files, was that perhaps my error? Thanks all.... any help would be welcome. _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: questions about split version of zipspeak questions about split version of zipspeak tony seth @ ` From Glenn Ervinat home. ` . 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: From Glenn Ervinat home. @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup I am quite sure that -d will recurse into the subdirectories stored in the zip file. I have noticed that with zipspeak, however, that it also wants to write over some files that have already been unzipped. And the last file of 21 or 22 files doesn't seem to unzip anything. ----- Original Message ----- From: "tony seth" <mantis420@hotmail.com> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:05 PM Subject: questions about split version of zipspeak Hi all. I accidentally posted my question via another email address, ooops, anyway, here's the question again. I tried installing the split version of zipspeak on a dos only system, dos 6.22 but when I used pkunzip to unzip it with the -d switch, instead of unzipping nicely to the linux directory with subdirectories, it did that, and as well, dumped several files in the root directory. I thought I did it right, but now I know AI either didn't or something happened that shouldn't have. I used the -d switch on all 22 files, was that perhaps my error? Thanks all.... any help would be welcome. _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: questions about split version of zipspeak ` From Glenn Ervinat home. @ ` . ` From Glenn Ervinat home. 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: . @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup I too noticed that, and when I tried to run it, well, I don't think I made it that far, as I had to clean up the root directory. Did you run the -d switch on all the files, or just the first one? Cheereo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "From Glenn Ervinat home." <glennervin@cableone.net> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:15 PM Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak > I am quite sure that -d will recurse into the subdirectories stored in the > zip file. > I have noticed that with zipspeak, however, that it also wants to write over > some files that have already been unzipped. > And the last file of 21 or 22 files doesn't seem to unzip anything. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tony seth" <mantis420@hotmail.com> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:05 PM > Subject: questions about split version of zipspeak > > > Hi all. I accidentally posted my question via another email address, ooops, > anyway, here's the question again. I tried installing the split version of > zipspeak on a dos only system, dos 6.22 but when I used pkunzip to unzip it > with the -d switch, instead of unzipping nicely to the linux directory with > subdirectories, it did that, and as well, dumped several files in the root > directory. I thought I did it right, but now I know AI either didn't or > something happened that shouldn't have. I used the -d switch on all 22 > files, was that perhaps my error? Thanks all.... any help would be welcome. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: questions about split version of zipspeak ` . @ ` From Glenn Ervinat home. ` . 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: From Glenn Ervinat home. @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup I ran the following command: c:\pkunzip zipspk*.zip -d This command unzipped all of the files with the -d command. ----- Original Message ----- From: "." <mantis420@hotmail.com> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak I too noticed that, and when I tried to run it, well, I don't think I made it that far, as I had to clean up the root directory. Did you run the -d switch on all the files, or just the first one? Cheereo. ----- Original Message ----- From: "From Glenn Ervinat home." <glennervin@cableone.net> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:15 PM Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak > I am quite sure that -d will recurse into the subdirectories stored in the > zip file. > I have noticed that with zipspeak, however, that it also wants to write over > some files that have already been unzipped. > And the last file of 21 or 22 files doesn't seem to unzip anything. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tony seth" <mantis420@hotmail.com> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:05 PM > Subject: questions about split version of zipspeak > > > Hi all. I accidentally posted my question via another email address, ooops, > anyway, here's the question again. I tried installing the split version of > zipspeak on a dos only system, dos 6.22 but when I used pkunzip to unzip it > with the -d switch, instead of unzipping nicely to the linux directory with > subdirectories, it did that, and as well, dumped several files in the root > directory. I thought I did it right, but now I know AI either didn't or > something happened that shouldn't have. I used the -d switch on all 22 > files, was that perhaps my error? Thanks all.... any help would be welcome. > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: questions about split version of zipspeak ` From Glenn Ervinat home. @ ` . 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: . @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: speakup Okay, thanks, guess I'll take another smack at it, Cheereo! ----- Original Message ----- From: "From Glenn Ervinat home." <glennervin@cableone.net> To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 8:32 PM Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak > I ran the following command: > c:\pkunzip zipspk*.zip -d > This command unzipped all of the files with the -d command. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "." <mantis420@hotmail.com> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:23 PM > Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak > > > I too noticed that, and when I tried to run it, well, I don't think I made > it that far, as I had to clean up the root directory. Did you run the -d > switch on all the files, or just the first one? Cheereo. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "From Glenn Ervinat home." <glennervin@cableone.net> > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:15 PM > Subject: Re: questions about split version of zipspeak > > > > I am quite sure that -d will recurse into the subdirectories stored in the > > zip file. > > I have noticed that with zipspeak, however, that it also wants to write > over > > some files that have already been unzipped. > > And the last file of 21 or 22 files doesn't seem to unzip anything. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "tony seth" <mantis420@hotmail.com> > > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca> > > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:05 PM > > Subject: questions about split version of zipspeak > > > > > > Hi all. I accidentally posted my question via another email address, > ooops, > > anyway, here's the question again. I tried installing the split version > of > > zipspeak on a dos only system, dos 6.22 but when I used pkunzip to unzip > it > > with the -d switch, instead of unzipping nicely to the linux directory > with > > subdirectories, it did that, and as well, dumped several files in the root > > directory. I thought I did it right, but now I know AI either didn't or > > something happened that shouldn't have. I used the -d switch on all 22 > > files, was that perhaps my error? Thanks all.... any help would be > welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
questions about split version of zipspeak tony seth
` From Glenn Ervinat home.
` .
` From Glenn Ervinat home.
` .
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).