From: "Thomas Ward" <tward@bright.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Speakup Configurator
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:23:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002001c15015$a231ea00$1a128fd1@j8i3x3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110080836200.28015-100000@lnx1.holmesgrown.com>
As far as the Dectalk Express goes I remember that Jaws for Dos used a pitch
skale of 1 to 10. This basically, moved the pitch by 10 everytime you moved
up or down.
I think this would work great with Speakup, and I can't wait to see the
updated version of your program.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Holmes" <steve@holmesgrown.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: Speakup Configurator
> I think what I'm gonna do is try and accomodate Speakout and Doubletalk
> first. This will enable me to get the program to save valid parameter
> features and ranges for each synthesiser so that the proper features and
> ranges can be made available automatically depending on which synthesiser
> is currently being used. Once this is accomplished, I should be able to
> add other synthesisers in the future with much less fuss. Right now, I
> hard coded things thinking of one box and well I got painted into a corner
> real fast! Gee, thought my programming skills could have helped me avoid
> that trap:).
>
> One general question I would like to ask of all synthesiser users though,
> What about parameters that allow for a hundred or more choices? I'm
> thinking of a range of 00 to 99 or something like that. With my current
> design, one could end up having to press up or down arrow a hundred times
> to make the complete loop. Would it be necessary to stop at every point or
> would it be acceptable to say, skip every ten values to scale our keyboard
> approach to having ten choices instead of a hundred.
>
> Whad do you all think?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Steve Holmes
` Thomas Ward [this message]
` Michael
` Jason
` Thomas Stivers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
Watson, Keith
Steve Holmes
` Buddy Brannan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002001c15015$a231ea00$1a128fd1@j8i3x3' \
--to=tward@bright.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).