From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [205.212.123.7] (helo=tiberius.bright.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15qdEd-0002ei-00 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:26:31 -0400 Received: from j8i3x3 ([209.143.18.26]) by tiberius.bright.net with SMTP id <20011008162526.JJXG700.tiberius@j8i3x3> for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:25:26 -0400 Message-ID: <002001c15015$a231ea00$1a128fd1@j8i3x3> From: "Thomas Ward" To: References: Subject: Re: Speakup Configurator Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:23:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: As far as the Dectalk Express goes I remember that Jaws for Dos used a pitch skale of 1 to 10. This basically, moved the pitch by 10 everytime you moved up or down. I think this would work great with Speakup, and I can't wait to see the updated version of your program. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Holmes" To: Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:43 AM Subject: Speakup Configurator > I think what I'm gonna do is try and accomodate Speakout and Doubletalk > first. This will enable me to get the program to save valid parameter > features and ranges for each synthesiser so that the proper features and > ranges can be made available automatically depending on which synthesiser > is currently being used. Once this is accomplished, I should be able to > add other synthesisers in the future with much less fuss. Right now, I > hard coded things thinking of one box and well I got painted into a corner > real fast! Gee, thought my programming skills could have helped me avoid > that trap:). > > One general question I would like to ask of all synthesiser users though, > What about parameters that allow for a hundred or more choices? I'm > thinking of a range of 00 to 99 or something like that. With my current > design, one could end up having to press up or down arrow a hundred times > to make the complete loop. Would it be necessary to stop at every point or > would it be acceptable to say, skip every ten values to scale our keyboard > approach to having ten choices instead of a hundred. > > Whad do you all think? > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >