From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@nc.rr.com>
To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'"
<speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: RE: Speakup in user space, why or why not?
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:05:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001101c5c8a1$3cc88030$6701a8c0@QUARK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.0.20051003221551.0365c390@freedomchat.org>
Thanks much for your email, and it is he. All that he/she must get tiring to
type, *smile*: thank you though.
Take care,
Sina
-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of ace
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:18 PM
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Subject: Re: Speakup in user space, why or why not?
Personally, I think you all took Sina the wrong way.
You lot seem to be overlooking his/her point completely.
He/she was looking for information. Simply that. Searching for
information. Knowledge. To be educated. Not for when such a project can
be done or who will do it.
I understood your point entirely, Sina.
At 06:12 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote:
>Naaaaa, Gene's message was not imature or any such thing, I think you
>missed the point and didn't read the entire message. What he was saying
>in a much longer version than I would have is this.
>
>You want it, find someone or do it yourself. If Kirk or anyone else
>wanted to do this, you bet it would have been done.
>So, there's the short version. Its possible, but no one is interested
>in doing it. I think that sums it up real nice. Gee I think Gene said
>it nicer than I.
>Btw, I think Gene was quite adult about the entire message her wrote, I
>think you simply took it the wrong way.
>
>
>On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Sina Bahram wrote:
>
>>Hi Gene,
>>
>>I have asked a ligitamet question for the purpose of knowledge and
>>open discussion ... A wonderful bit of which has happened already.
>>
>>Yet I receive this email from you that wishes to accuse. Frankly, I
>>don't have time to ask loaded questions, so if I'm asking, it means I
>>want to know.
>>
>>I'm sending another email with my answers inline, but I find it quite
>>sad that you have sent such an immature response to a ligitamet
>>question that the rest of us are discussing like adults.
>>
>>Take care,
>>Sina
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Sina Bahram
` Gregory Nowak
` Garrett Klein
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Sina Bahram
` Janina Sajka
` Kenny Hitt
` Sina Bahram
` Lorenzo Taylor
` Sina Bahram
` Gene Collins
` Sina Bahram
` Gene Collins
` Sina Bahram
` Scott Howell
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Sina Bahram
` ace
` Sina Bahram [this message]
` Sina Bahram
` Lorenzo Taylor
` Sina Bahram
` Luke Yelavich
` Jim Grimsby
` Sina Bahram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001101c5c8a1$3cc88030$6701a8c0@QUARK' \
--to=sbahram@nc.rr.com \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).