From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from uni01mr.unity.ncsu.edu ([152.1.1.164]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EMezi-0002ZC-00 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:05:38 -0400 Received: from QUARK (cpe-069-134-173-071.nc.res.rr.com [69.134.173.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by uni01mr.unity.ncsu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/N.20050816.01) with ESMTP id j9455ZOO014504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:05:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sina Bahram" To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'" Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:05:27 -0400 Message-ID: <001101c5c8a1$3cc88030$6701a8c0@QUARK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.0.20051003221551.0365c390@freedomchat.org> Thread-Index: AcXIif7A2Qp0TQ0UTD2jg2mpjmyZ2wAFyrpA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.2, Antispam-Data: 2005.10.3.42 X-Spam-Status: No, Hits=7% X-Spam-Level: IIIIIII Subject: RE: Speakup in user space, why or why not? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:05:39 -0000 Thanks much for your email, and it is he. All that he/she must get tiring to type, *smile*: thank you though. Take care, Sina -----Original Message----- From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of ace Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:18 PM To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Subject: Re: Speakup in user space, why or why not? Personally, I think you all took Sina the wrong way. You lot seem to be overlooking his/her point completely. He/she was looking for information. Simply that. Searching for information. Knowledge. To be educated. Not for when such a project can be done or who will do it. I understood your point entirely, Sina. At 06:12 PM 10/3/2005, you wrote: >Naaaaa, Gene's message was not imature or any such thing, I think you >missed the point and didn't read the entire message. What he was saying >in a much longer version than I would have is this. > >You want it, find someone or do it yourself. If Kirk or anyone else >wanted to do this, you bet it would have been done. >So, there's the short version. Its possible, but no one is interested >in doing it. I think that sums it up real nice. Gee I think Gene said >it nicer than I. >Btw, I think Gene was quite adult about the entire message her wrote, I >think you simply took it the wrong way. > > >On Oct 3, 2005, at 1:02 AM, Sina Bahram wrote: > >>Hi Gene, >> >>I have asked a ligitamet question for the purpose of knowledge and >>open discussion ... A wonderful bit of which has happened already. >> >>Yet I receive this email from you that wishes to accuse. Frankly, I >>don't have time to ask loaded questions, so if I'm asking, it means I >>want to know. >> >>I'm sending another email with my answers inline, but I find it quite >>sad that you have sent such an immature response to a ligitamet >>question that the rest of us are discussing like adults. >> >>Take care, >>Sina > > >_______________________________________________ >Speakup mailing list >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup