public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tyler Littlefield" <tyler@tysdomain.com>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Best distro
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:19:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01c8e54f$9fe98ec0$4200a8c0@tdsportable> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080714010540.GA19956@clearwire.net>

>Debian still doesn't support SpeakUP,
someone has some research to do:
http://people.debian.org/~shane
As for the rest, ubunu is built off debian, so if ubuntu supports speakup 
but debian doesn't, we've got a problem.
I like debian, because of it's package management, and it's ease of 
use--others like slack and gentu etc, but you've got to compile 
everything--there are some precompiled packages I think, but debian is a 
simple apt-get install in most cases.
Last time I had to install a package on fedora, I had to go find it's 
dependents dependents dependents dependents great ancestors off in some far 
away web page, which required some more dependence dependences be located, 
and so on.

Thanks,
~~TheCreator~~
Visit TDS for quality software and website production
http://tysdomain.com
visit the piratecafe for programming related resources:
http://piratecafe.net
msn: tyler@tysdomain.com
skype: st8amnd127
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Foreign White Devil" <gaijin@clearwire.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: Best distro


> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 03:34:17PM -0700, DON.RAIKES@ORACLE.COM wrote:
>> I realize I am probably starting a feud, but what are the pros and cons
>
> Fedora and Ubuntu are probably the easiest for getting started
> in Linux.  Debian still doesn't support SpeakUP, and for the foreseeable
> next three years, probably still won't, and the others are more
> difficult to use and learn.  Fedora is Redhat based as far as their
> package manager (the ability to add/remove programs) and is probably the
> more popular, while Ubuntu uses the Debian package manager, which in my
> opinion is the superior product (unless Fedora has improved their older
> practices, and I think they have).  There's probably just a tad more
> support for Fedora, but don't quote me on it.  I'm still sticking with
> Debian, myself, for the bug-tracking system, the package manager, and
> their ideals to never release crap, even if it means releasing nothing
> at all.  download and try the Live-CD's, which allow you to try each
> distro before deciding on the one that suits.  They run in memory and
> don't change your current operating system.  Hang out in the
> irc.freenode.net chatrooms and see which impresses you the most.  You
> can tell alot about a distro by the users running it and what help they
> generally provide.  You'll probably be visiting them alot as you learn
> your way around the system.  I would recommend trying the Fedora and
> Ubuntu Live-CD's, see how well written  and helpful they are as far as
> documentation and ease of setup goes, and pick one or the other of the
> two.  It is going to be an adventure as you learn, and you'll likely go
> back and make many changes to how you want things set up, especially
> where disk partitioning is concerned, and kept data.  I like my home or
> user directories separate, so daya I've collected is still there if I
> need to reinstall from scratch or decide to ditch  everything for
> another distro.  YMMV, but Fedora and Ubuntu will give you the fullest
> of all possible setup options and software selections of the latest and
> greatest stuff.  All the other distros are mainly offshoots of Redhat,
> Debian, BSD, SuSE, and Slackware, each being noted mainly for their
> method of package or software management.  I don't recommend the last
> three, as their package management methods and software selection sucks
> by comparison to the first two.  Redhat/Fedora will probably provide the
> most support, and while Debian/Ubuntu fixes the bugs quicker, Debian
> (not Ubuntu) takes forever to add support for newer software.  HTH,
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> __________ NOD32 3263 (20080711) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 slackware 12.1 and ltlk synthesizer Jude DaShiell
 ` Best distro DON.RAIKES
   ` Foreign White Devil
     ` Tyler Littlefield [this message]
       ` Gregory Nowak
         ` Tyler Littlefield
           ` Samuel Thibault
           ` Foreign White Devil
             ` Gregory Nowak
               ` Michael Whapples
         ` Shane's kernels (was: Best distro) John Heim
           ` Shane's kernels Tony Baechler
             ` Foreign White Devil
               ` Daniel Dalton
                 ` Tony Baechler
                   ` Samuel Thibault
                     ` Daniel Dalton
                       ` Samuel Thibault
                         ` Daniel Dalton
                           ` Samuel Thibault
                       ` Foreign White Devil
                         ` Samuel Thibault
                           ` Kristoffer Gustafsson
                             ` Samuel Thibault
                               ` John G. Heim
                             ` Daniel Dalton
                     ` Tony Baechler
                       ` Samuel Thibault
                       ` Daniel Dalton
                       ` Foreign White Devil
                   ` Daniel Dalton
                     ` Samuel Thibault
                 ` Foreign White Devil
       ` Best distro Foreign White Devil
         ` Tyler Littlefield
       ` Tony Baechler
     ` Samuel Thibault
       ` Foreign White Devil
     ` Tony Baechler
     ` Michael Whapples

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000b01c8e54f$9fe98ec0$4200a8c0@tdsportable' \
    --to=tyler@tysdomain.com \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).