Speakup and synth initialization at boot

Speakup and synth initialization at boot

[Victor Tsaran]

Hi, Kirk!
 How long do you wait before you give on synth's initialization? For
instance, it seems as though Speakup doesn't wait too long to receive a
response from synth. I noticed that on some synths, it might be my problem
as well, if the cable is damaged a bit, it may take longer for the synth to
send a response string.
What would you say?
Regards,
Vic

PS BTW, neither DOS nor WIndow-eyes screen readers have no problems with
that.

Re: Speakup and synth initialization at boot

[Kirk Reiser]

"Victor Tsaran" <vtsaran@nimbus.ocis.temple.edu> writes:

>  How long do you wait before you give on synth's initialization? For
> instance, it seems as though Speakup doesn't wait too long to receive a
> response from synth. I noticed that on some synths, it might be my problem

I don't remember off hand how long I wait.  It is plenty long enough
for the synth to respond if it is going to though.  If you have used
the speakup_ser option then the timer isn't used anyway.

> as well, if the cable is damaged a bit, it may take longer for the synth to
> send a response string.
> What would you say?

No.  If the cable is damaged then it will probably not work.  If it
has a lose connection or two then the problem will be intermittent so it
will work sometimes but not others.  As far as I know, damaged cables
don't slow down electrons.

You might want to ask Bill if he has built the newer Redhat 6.2 images
with the newest speakup_ltlk driver.  I've changed the way the synth
is detected.

  Kirk

-- 

Kirk Reiser				The Computer Braille Facility
e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca		University of Western Ontario
phone: (519) 661-3061

Re: Speakup and synth initialization at boot

[William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123]

Hi all,

     The rh6.2 bootdisks were built using the stuff from the newdrv.tar.gz
archive dated 2/8/2000.  I don't know if that's the latest ltlk driver.


          HTH.
          Bill