* debian on a laptop? @ Karen Lewellen ` Trevor Saunders 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Karen Lewellen @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux for blind general discussion Granted I have the desktop hardware sitting in my office for a Linux box, but am told no one in Toronto can do this sort of work from an access standpoint. Debian does have some programs I would like to use, like lilly-pond, and I understand ebrowse can work with it, we are still working on this at shellworld. My two questions are basic hardware specifications if I go with laptop instead, and what about speech? I prefer tectalk speech if I can get it, which I guess? meaning I could be wrong, means an external synthesizer? thanks in advance, Karen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: debian on a laptop? debian on a laptop? Karen Lewellen @ ` Trevor Saunders ` Karen Lewellen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Trevor Saunders @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: blinux-list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1293 bytes --] On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:25:38PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Granted I have the desktop hardware sitting in my office for a Linux > box, but am told no one in Toronto can do this sort of work from an > access standpoint. hmm? I'm not sure what you mean, what work is this? I ee you are writing from a shellworld email so my first gues would be some sort of syadminy thing, which I would think you could do just fine from a linux, imho more comfortably than from a windows one. > My two questions are basic hardware specifications if I go with > laptop instead, and what about speech? for what hardware it mostly depends on what you plan to do with the machine, but I'd also keep in mind what hardware is likely to take work to get working. > I prefer tectalk speech if I can get it, which I guess? meaning I > could be wrong, means an external synthesizer? I've never heard of techtalk to you mean the ibmtts / ttsynth eliquence like thing? Personally I've always been perfectly fine with espeak, but I understand plenty of others feel differently. Trev > thanks in advance, > Karen > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: debian on a laptop? ` Trevor Saunders @ ` Karen Lewellen ` marbux ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Karen Lewellen @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux for blind general discussion Hi there, will try to speak to your points. >From my experience reading and the like, actually Janina told me this ages back, it is a good idea to have someone at your end who is at least vaguely familiar with Linux if devoting an entire machine to this for the first time. Just reading SOME of the commands one must type makes me dizzy sometimes lol. I run both a production and a nonprofit, am a radio journalist and professional singer. I do not mind tinkering in DOS, because I learned it well when I had more time for learning. I have far far less time to completely construct this system myself from the ground up without someone used to and familiar with the speech aspects, and the compiling requirements of Linux nearby to call. Given my druthers I would duplicate my first learning experience, get trained in the screen reader the basics of the operating system and a couple of my major programs, and learn where to look or read for help. I would happily pay for this, in town if I could find it. I am not lazy, just honest. I would rather concentrate on learning how to run what I must run, once constructed to make running easy if that makes sense, read documentation with a framework of understanding that moves me forward. I know what my talents are, and what they are not, or more how I can use my time these days grin. I think too I would rather learn first hand with someone, if I must do the constructing, but would rather not have to do much construction, certainly not alone. My computers are critical tools in my trade, I want my Linux machine to be what my other machines already are. ones I can count on as functional with a minimum amount of bugs, constant upgrading and issues. I want to enhance how I make my living and that means setup so I can count on it, and debian seems to put out solid packages. Think out of, ormostlyout of the box. As for my goals, two, perhaps three. I have in a sealed box the edition of wordperfect created for Linux / UNIX. unless I am sure this can be run, I am not going to do word processing, leaving only two. I have never been a windows user, so am not working from that frame of reference at all. solid command line is my life as I use DOS every single day, several hours a day. I seek slightly more Internet flexibility than I am getting now in terms of browsers. if that means ebrowse then terrific, or firefox if it works in debian. Ray keeps speaking of ice Wiesel, but I have not heard enough to know if this is the best alternative option. if I can I want to access youtube materials, audio in particular, or youtube like material as well thas I am starting to need this more and more for work. Lillypond is a composing package, so I would want to run this properly as well. I would add and include in my Internet concept getting and downloading books, both nls to my player, not on the computer, and or library e-book / audio book content and burning that content to a cd for playing n say a victor reader classic, or a standard cd player. as for my desire for dectalk, I appreciate that others have different experiences. Still I have used dectalk for computing and stand alone reading, I have a reading edge, for more than 15 years. my goal is to add this computer to my professional tools, fill in the gaps that I cannot already do elsewhere and with as little down time as possible. Actually my favorite voice still likely remains the old vert ones, but oh well. getting to working is what I want to minimize, meaning I want to choose in advance hardware in a fashion that will work. I would like to be able to travel with this machine, use the Internet either via dsl or dial up if the only option, on the road, as well as plug it into my rooter here at home when I need it. since I can do dsl in DOS, and friends come over with their windows laptops and go on the Internet at my house, I feel sure it should be achievable in Linux too. Is this more clear? Karen On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:25:38PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> Granted I have the desktop hardware sitting in my office for a Linux >> box, but am told no one in Toronto can do this sort of work from an >> access standpoint. > > hmm? I'm not sure what you mean, what work is this? I ee you are > writing from a shellworld email so my first gues would be some sort of > syadminy thing, which I would think you could do just fine from a > linux, imho more comfortably than from a windows one. > >> My two questions are basic hardware specifications if I go with >> laptop instead, and what about speech? > > for what hardware it mostly depends on what you plan to do with the > machine, but I'd also keep in mind what hardware is likely to take work > to get working. > >> I prefer tectalk speech if I can get it, which I guess? meaning I >> could be wrong, means an external synthesizer? > > I've never heard of techtalk to you mean the ibmtts / ttsynth eliquence > like thing? Personally I've always been perfectly fine with espeak, but > I understand plenty of others feel differently. > > Trev > >> thanks in advance, >> Karen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blinux-list mailing list >> Blinux-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: debian on a laptop? ` Karen Lewellen @ ` marbux ` RiverWind ` Geoff Shang 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: marbux @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux for blind general discussion On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> wrote: > As for my goals, two, perhaps three. I have in a sealed box the edition of > wordperfect created for Linux / UNIX. unless I am sure this can be run, I > am not going to do word processing, leaving only two. What version of WordPerfect? If it's 8 or 8.1 (or earlier), it should work although you may need to run an older version of the Linux kernel for it. If it's WordPerfect Office 2000, it's an initial port of WP Office for Windows to WINE and is full of show-stopper bugs; no updates were ever issued. Despite considerable involvement in the WordPerfect user community, I know of no one who thinks of it as usable. > browsers. if that means ebrowse then terrific, or firefox if it works in > debian. Ray keeps speaking of ice Wiesel, but I have not heard enough to > know if this is the best alternative option. Ice Weasel *is* Firefox with the Firefox branding removed because of trademark claims by the Mozilla Foundation making the branded version incompatible with GPL licensing and ineligible for inclusion in Linux distributions whose developers who refuse to ship software that is incompatible with the GPL. Negotiations continue to resolve the trademark issue and if successful will likely result in Ice Weasel becoming a thing of the past. Personally, I almost never use Firefox anymore, only when I need a particular Firefox extension. Google Chrome is a much superior browser, in no small part because each open web page is launched in a separate process. The practical result is that if a given page has problems or is very slow in loading, you can continue to use the browser for other pages, without having to kill the browser's process to recover. Chrome is based on the WebKit page rendering engine, which is also way better than the Mozilla Gecko engine used in Firefox. WebKit is an emerging de facto standard for web browsers and client-side apps that run in a browser. WebKit began its life as the KHTML page rendering engine used by KDE apps. It was picked up and improved by Apple for its Safari browser, then by Google and now again by KDE. Opera is also migrating to WebKit. If you have objections to proprietary software, you might check out Chromium, the open source browser project's code that Google Chrome is based on. <http://www.chromium.org/Home>. But there are far fewer extensions available for it. Best regards, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: debian on a laptop? ` Karen Lewellen ` marbux @ ` RiverWind ` Geoff Shang 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: RiverWind @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux for blind general discussion Greetings and Salutations Just a few notes, I have been working with Ice-Weasel for a few months now, and have amassed a bit of know-how where usage of that browser is concerned. Incidently, Ice Weasel is not much more than Mozilla's Linux version of Fire-Fox which they developed for Windows. Ice-Weasel increases the scope of your browsing capability, especially where Java Script is concerned. I have had quite an experience with the processing and/or use of NLS books, but I have reached the point where I believe myself to be at the point where I am qualified to write a brief manual on the subject. Also the use of portable peripherals such as flash-drives is another thing with which I have perforce become proficient. I would be happy to share all of my experience and hard-won knowledge on these topics if doing so would prevent others from experiencing the headaches that I myself experienced. Hells-bells, had it not been for this group, blind-l and BardTalk, I would be in quite a fix out of which there would be no appreciable egress. Internet browsing, reading NLS books and using flash-drives and the like, pose different challenges for linux users than they do for those who use Windows as their primary operating system. This tends to put a bit of a kink in the learning curve. However, the extra challenges aren't at all insurmountable. Most Cordially Indeed, Riverwind Feel free to visit my website and my blog and learn more about me and what I stand for. My Website @ http://riverwind.shellworld.net My Blog http://windraven13.livejournal.com/\x1a ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: debian on a laptop? ` Karen Lewellen ` marbux ` RiverWind @ ` Geoff Shang 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Geoff Shang @ UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux for blind general discussion On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> From my experience reading and the like, actually Janina told me this ages > back, it is a good idea to have someone at your end who is at least vaguely > familiar with Linux if devoting an entire machine to this for the first time. This is not so much the case as it used to be, particularly if it's not your only machine and you can use other means to get assistance from the net. > Just reading SOME of the commands one must type makes me dizzy sometimes lol. > I run both a production and a nonprofit, am a radio journalist and > professional singer. I do not mind tinkering in DOS, because I learned it > well when I had more time for learning. > I have far far less time to completely construct this system myself from the > ground up without someone used to and familiar with the speech aspects, and > the compiling requirements of Linux nearby to call. There is less and less need to compile anything these days, unless you have very special requirements. Certainly I have not done a kernel compilation in literally years. > I am not lazy, just honest. I would rather concentrate on learning how to run > what I must run, once constructed to make running easy if that makes sense, > read documentation with a framework of understanding that moves me forward. > I know what my talents are, and what they are not, or more how I can use my > time these days grin. I know where you're coming from. I don't have the luxury of being able to mess with things that I used to have. Fortunately, speech and Braille solutions are now part of mainstream distributions, and therefore integrate much more nicely into the "easy" way of doing things. I've only ever used Debian, and others may well evangelise their own distributions, but I certainly find it to be good. Even using the most recent stable release from 2 years ago, I was able to install it from scratch using Speakup and an external speech synthesiser. The next version of Debian is due to be released shortly. As for Dectalk, I'm not a big expert on this synth but you're likely to need to use hardware for this, and I don't know if it will work with Orca. Geoff. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
debian on a laptop? Karen Lewellen
` Trevor Saunders
` Karen Lewellen
` marbux
` RiverWind
` Geoff Shang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).