From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from speech.braille.uwo.ca (speech.braille.uwo.ca [129.100.249.132]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821F11EF707 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:25:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) id 68732C1A153; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:24:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C1BC1A0F7 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:24:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UM64w-0007h6-Ky for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:24:58 +0100 Received: from jdc.jasonjgw.net ([59.167.198.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:24:58 +0100 Received: from jason by jdc.jasonjgw.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 01:24:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca From: Jason White Subject: Re: Speakup Issues Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20130329215924.GA14887@linux1> <20130330013250.GA17036@gregn.net> <20130330121255.GB17037@linlap.wavecable.com> <20130331000727.GA31686@gregn.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jdc.jasonjgw.net X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: jason@jdc.jasonjgw.net (Jason White) X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:25:24 -0000 Gregory Nowak wrote: >I agree. However, no one has said so far as far as I know that support >for isa synths is keeping speakup out of the kernel spotlight. William >simply asked if anybody is still using these, and my answer is yes. If it isn't creating a significant maintenance burden, I would recommend leaving the code in place. As an aside, I have a DECTALK-PC card here that requires an ISA slot, but no machine in which to run it and no current need for it. At some point I'll donate it to a worthy recipient, who will then have the interesting experience of discovering whether or not it works anymore.