From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.freeshell.org [192.94.73.19]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ABE10B00 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:28:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:eheil@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.2]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2RFSOgX009420 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:28:24 GMT Received: (from eheil@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id n2RFSJrZ017215; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:28:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Erik Heil X-X-Sender: eheil@otaku.freeshell.org To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: RE: speakup.synth= vs modprobe In-Reply-To: <0KH400K0SNS34KS3@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> Message-ID: References: <0KH400K0SNS34KS3@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (NEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:28:25 -0000 Hi their. In Debian, their is something called modconf, and also their is Module Assistant. I have not personally tried these tools, but wouldn't they be helpful in this situation? Just my two sense. --Erik On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, al Sten-Clanton wrote: > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:06:54 -0400 > From: al Sten-Clanton > Reply-To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. > > To: 'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.' > Subject: RE: speakup.synth= vs modprobe > > "Hmm... > Modules are separate from kernel, so kernel parameter speakup.synth can't > work if kernel doesn't ewen know what is speakup. > Add your proper speakup modules to some files to make the debian > automatically load it. > I don't remember where you can do this. > Thanks." > > Does this mean that, unlike with, say, Fedora 9 or the earlier versions of > GRML, you can't have speakup available early in the boot process? I was > able to work around this for Fedora 10 using mkinitrd, but I couldn't find > that program when I tried this with the latest GRML. I ask only in part out > of curiosity. Thanks! > > Al > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > eheil@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org