From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660F2C1A429 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:12:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4101A67D for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:12:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:12:33 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: uB3IltEOFkh2/EXEKwygnI2/1ry/d0e8Dv6AXOpvNY81 1291227152 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (128-193-247-78.resnet.oregonstate.edu [128.193.247.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D04D9401455 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:12:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:12:31 -0800 (PST) From: Zachary Kline X-X-Sender: zkline@blackhawk.localdomain To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Progress reports In-Reply-To: <20101201181037.GA3166@romuald.net.eu.org> Message-ID: References: <99j320$5lpj17@ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net> <20101201113026.GA6540@rx.localhost> <20101201181037.GA3166@romuald.net.eu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:12:33 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Gregory Nowak wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 06:30:26AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote: >> Is the >> default for ln to make hard links or soft? > > I believe ln makes hard links by default. > >> Would either style work in >> this setup? > > I don't see why not, but I could be wrong. Technically, symlinks can cross filesystem boundaries, whereas hard links cannot. Beyond that, for this particular situation I think they're pretty much equivalent.