From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35472C1A1F4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:57:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFCF22C for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:57:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=OC1GqBFpqQMkb4DzscpYUVwiU8A=; b=juE0/LEMVVAqpTCwiHMsJXMTY/uTwin8GrvBaTad1jXqlrlmfvL3pJ7YRpZBa8+5dgUU28Gai0Ex21qS8v8efZ3XI89GXY+hccG9gnaSZ7pk5oI1iicuSEoOCR7KblmHwMN32ZVeBMd1/g43Q0BWCFL7yeF/6Il6UFhT1b74Hs0= X-Sasl-enc: id77GeQpw+aLtUXzjYxuk4n6i+EBVlSNoYfk5uqEjDIZ 1284685052 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (069-064-234-003.pdx.net [69.64.234.3]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02E065E54C0 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:57:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:58:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Zachary Kline X-X-Sender: zkline@localhost.localdomain To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Minor hiccups with espeak 1.44.05 and espeakup 0.71-3 on Arch Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:57:33 -0000 Hi All, Just a heads up of sorts. I've noticed occasional complaints from Espeak 1.44.05 about getting bad intonation data when used with Espeakup 0.71. This is on my ArchLinux system, updated earlier today. Occasional tonal strangeness seems to be the only issue so far, other than some decidedly odd pronounciations in the latest versions of Espeak which previously were correct. Best and thanks, Zack.