From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wb2flw.octothorp.org (wb2flw.octothorp.org [207.224.49.210]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C584A10B65 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 15:44:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wb2flw.octothorp.org (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by wb2flw.octothorp.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m72Ji7ou008223 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:44:07 GMT Received: from localhost (wacker@localhost) by wb2flw.octothorp.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m72Ji6gD008218 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:44:07 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: wb2flw.octothorp.org: wacker owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:44:06 -0600 (MDT) From: "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: Initial success with Espeakup In-Reply-To: <20080802164948.GB9715@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20080802164948.GB9715@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:44:18 -0000 You should be able to catch up with the control, or any other key for that matter, but espeakup/espeak is a bit sluggish in stopping. It is hoped that something can be done about it, but it's not too much of a big deal as Zack has already indicated. -- Bill in Denver On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Gregory Nowak wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > That's to be expected I think, since the proper way to silence speakup > is with numpad-enter. > > Greg > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 07:08:09AM -0700, Zachary Kline wrote: >> Hi, >> I've just downloaded Espeakup from Git. I'm pleased to say that so far >> I've had quite good success with it, and Espeak as a whole seems >> responsive. >> I did notice slight delays between my use of the control key to silence >> speech and the time it actually got quiet. This is a minor problem, >> though. >> Great work! >> Best, >> Zack. >>