From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: befuddled.reisers.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=rednote.net header.i=@rednote.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=fKFHpq7K; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 0751D381155; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:50:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.rednote.net (opera.rednote.net [66.228.34.147]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0E438114A for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:50:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from opera.rednote.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rednote.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7037BFA278; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:50:56 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rednote.net; s=dkim; t=1640721056; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PwrNicTBx0ddZe2SGEsMuePWMxlzFhdOL3AMqi6zuPc=; b=fKFHpq7KkRQSoo7wiNhCdSNwkh+vwldcg1sqtSX1wg+9HD6w7a9uYG0mZg+sNBeryhB1zt EzO4CnqOMRg3vUuhxNeNedtEdeeRaffrR8PaV5WvxmK0e0jV7kpluc/OgQLuvuq2qRiYPm CywxZeJ2t5NE+kLVyYg11qhrbJCSr8c= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.rednote.net 7037BFA278 Authentication-Results: mail.rednote.net; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=rednote.net Authentication-Results: mail.rednote.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rednote.net Received: (from janina@localhost) by opera.rednote.net (8.17.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1BSJoupp948831; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:50:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 14:50:56 -0500 From: Janina Sajka To: Didier Spaier Cc: speakup@linux-speakup.org Subject: Re: Now Fixed: Archlinux Speakup problems after alsa package upgrade Message-ID: References: <20210609110828.kpo76f2zmbixjran@begin> <6b4b229d-5e00-22e4-8cf2-33ed7bbd6b93@gmail.com> <3cefe3e6-f95a-ffe9-5995-543d6e4357db@jasonjgw.net> <055e3d2d-0653-3edc-4879-484816734d00@slint.fr> X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <055e3d2d-0653-3edc-4879-484816734d00@slint.fr> X-Operating-System: Linux opera.rednote.net 5.15.8-200.fc35.x86_64 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.5 Didier Spaier writes: > Hi Janina and all, > > On 28/12/2021 17:26, Janina Sajka wrote: > > ... > > > > Apparently there must be some kind of reason why Espeakup can't be > > agnostic between espeak and espeak-ng? > > espeakup is linked against the shared library installed at time of building it. > > Here: > dance[~]$ ldd /usr/bin/espeakup | grep libespeak > libespeak-ng.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libespeak-ng.so.1 (0x00007f290df83000) > Thanks, Didier. This does make sense. > My guess is you will find libespeak.so.1 instead running the same command. > > So you need to rebuild espeakup-0.90 after having removed espeak and installed > espeak-ng only. > Are you saying I need to run ldd by hand? I thought the installation process upgrading from 80 to 90 would take care of the ldd? It's true I did not run an ldd when I tried to upgrade my older machine to espeak-ng and espeakup-0.90. Best, Janina > It could be possible to just make a symlink instead, but that would ugly. Better > just get read of espeak. > > Cheers, > Didier > > -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa