From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 66992380BB7; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.shellworld.net (unknown [66.172.12.120]) by befuddled.reisers.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D79D380BB4 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by server2.shellworld.net (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 82B17540184; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802A354015C for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:39:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:39:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Lewellen To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." Subject: Re: So, where'd the volume controls get to? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20201010151312.fbz27eyoua2574tw@function> <20201010193636.35lws35s7dyliyto@function> <20201012045350.GA3377@gregn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 X-BeenThere: speakup@linux-speakup.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:39:54 -0000 If volume is restored, where is inflection now? granted I am not a speakup user, but one should have both, no? Karen On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Kirk Reiser wrote: > Thanks Greg for taking on testing the patches and releasing your > results. Also thanks again to Samuel for getting a fix out so quickly. > > Kirk > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2020, Gregory Nowak wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 09:36:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> > Would you be able to try the attached patch? >> >> I can confirm that Samuel's patch fixes the issue so that speakup+1 >> and speakup+2 controls volume again. >> >> Since I feel that volume control on the fly is fairly critical, I've >> decided to release my kernel build. The debian packages were built for >> a devuan Beowulf system, and should work on debian buster. This kernel >> should boot on most if not all x86_64 systems. There are modules for a >> variety of SATA controllers, and file systems. The debian packages >> aren't signed, and the kernel isn't signed either which your UEFI >> and/or boot loader might not like. If any of this makes you >> uncomfortable, wait for the fix to make it to where ever you get your >> kernel updates from, or build your own kernel with the patch (the www >> is your friend). >> >> For those who don't want to or can't install debian packages, the >> amd64_binaries directory has binaries for the kernel, modules, and >> headers. If installing this kernel breaks your system in any way, you >> get to keep all the pieces. >> >> You can find all of this at: >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@linux-speakup.org > http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup > >