From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com ([65.24.5.135] helo=ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BnQUh-0004Fp-00 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:27:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-024-033-004-163.midsouth.rr.com [24.33.4.163]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i6LNROJX026112 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:27:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:27:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Adam Myrow To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: utc X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:27:27 -0000 I've never heard of an implementation of the "at" command which requires its time to be specified in UTC. What distribution of Linux is this? It's sure not that way in Slackware. It seems kind of silly to make it require UTC.