From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mg-static.novocon.net ([64.80.15.7] helo=mg.novocon.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AFten-0006j2-00 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 06:11:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mg.novocon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FC6158B8B for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 06:10:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mg.novocon.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cache.novocon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 926) with LMTP id 11380-01-46 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 06:10:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.novocon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7173C52DA4 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 06:10:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.novocon.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.novocon.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 926) with LMTP id 21836-01-47 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 06:10:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 06:10:23 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Hallenbeck To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at novocon.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at novocon.net Subject: Re: Possible Mailman configuration problem on this list? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: Charles Hallenbeck , "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 11:11:02 -0000 Hi Bill, I am a pine user and was unable to replicate what you described. When I replied "yes" to the reply-to question I was dropped right into my editor. Chuck On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote: > Hi all, > > I notice that when Luke replied to Rejean, Rejean got a copy, as well > as the list. It isn't very likely that Luke meant to do that. So, using > Pine, I hit R, was asked the usual question about including the text of > the message being replied to, prompted whether I wanted to use the > reply-to address rather than the From: address, I said yes. Usually, that > would be that, but I was then asked if I wanted to reply to all > recipients. Normally, I only get prompted for that if I say no to the > previous prompt about using the reply-to address. > > What y'all think? > -- The Moon is Waxing Gibbous (53% of Full) Get my public key from website, http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh