From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dsl092-170-086.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.170.86] helo=toccata.rednote.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16WeUk-0008WQ-00 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:16:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (janina@localhost) by toccata.rednote.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g11EDlj06576 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:13:48 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: toccata.rednote.net: janina owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:13:47 -0500 (EST) From: Janina Sajka X-X-Sender: janina@toccata.rednote.net To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: So much Windows Mailer crap on this list... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Brian: I just have to tell you that on some of my darker days I actually consider writing a procmail recipie to pounce on the Windows 1252 char set and pipe the message to /dev/null. On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Brian Borowski wrote: > I guess this has been discussed bofore, but I can't help doing it again. > Why do so many people use outlook and other Windows utilities to post to > this list? It's understandable if you're a new user, but doing it for a > year or two, makes me wonder; if you're a Windows user and never want to > use linux to do your stuff; get off the list, and stop polluting it with > crap. If you're a windows user, and insist on posting (especially for > some of those high-volume posters), then change your settings so that we > don't have to se a couple of Kbytes of header, and shut off the damn html > repeat of your message that shows up at the end. It may come as a big > surprise to some people, but when us people who use pine and other mail > readers have to go through hundreds of messages; we don't want to see > (hear) all that garbage; it's a nuisance, and it slows us down terribly, > just trying to get through the list. > > Also, I'm in complete agreement with the complaints about including > messages including messages, including messages within eachother until > things get huge; it's a waste of bandwidth, and time. I also notice, that > some users seem to post multiple copies of their messages; please, have > pity on us who read our mail? While I'm complaining: > Why do people include 50 or 100 lines of others messages, and then put > their one line comment about it right at the end of all that stuff? My > advice, is that if you're going to include all that stuff, and have five or > ten words to say about; why not put your comment at the top, and save us > all that reading through stuff we've probably already seen before so many > times? > > Brian Borowski > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > -- Janina Sajka, Director Technology Research and Development Governmental Relations Group American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 Chair, Accessibility SIG Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) http://www.openebook.org