From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hagus.bright.net ([209.143.0.74]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16syyL-0006gm-00 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2002 23:35:41 -0500 Received: from woos-max1-cs-5.dialne.bright.net (woos-max1-cs-5.dialne.bright.net [66.219.154.7]) by hagus.bright.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g344ZhqC022237 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:35:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:40:12 -0500 (EST) From: "Thomas D. Ward" X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: jobs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I've seen similar problems with using background, and choose to use screen instead. That works 100% better. On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Igor Gueths wrote: > Hi all. Just as an experiment, I attempted to put Lynx in the background > and Freeamp was streaming a radio station that I just happened to be > listening to. I suspended the job and put job 1 in the background, because > I had no other jobs running. It ran fine and I was sitting at the bash > prompt, however when I typed a command, the job got killed. Does anyone > know why this happens? I think that it is very interesting, considering > that a cp and/or erasing job on a Cd for example would run fine after > being suspended and switched to a background process. Could this have to > do that Lynx can't run in the background if it is running an imbedded > application such as Freeamp? Thanks in advance for any info regarding > this! > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >