From: "Thomas D. Ward" <tward@bright.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: free programming language
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:10:29 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203121107560.2670-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203110937270.13689-100000@babel.hpcc.noaa.gov>
Hi, I certainly agree here. Basic is not a good choice. Perl might be a
better language to try. At least it offers some good programming habbits,
and is a modern language to boot.
I started out by learning C, and it really gave me a real pointer on how
to program. There are vary books out there that teach c and make it as
easy as possible to learn.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002
jwantz@hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> I definitely disagree. BASIC teaches bad programming habits like
> FORTRAN i.e. non-structured programming. The problem with C is not the
> language, but that most people learning C start by reading Kernighan and
> Richie. I have been programming in C since 1986 but it took me almost
> half of that time to unlearn bad habits I picked up from BASIC and
> FORTRAN. Now, one could make a case for Pascal as your first language
> but I really think BASIC is a bad idea. Sure, you might be able to
> accomplish certain tasks easier in BASIC than in C, but the time you
> spend in learning C will make you a much better programmer in the long
> run.
> Jim Wantz
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Gregory Nowak wrote:
>
> > Since we're on opinions, in my opinion c or c++ are not good languages to begin with. I believe from personal experience that it is best to start with something like basic, and then move on to languages like c or c++ where the concepts you learned from BASIC will help you advance in higher languages faster.
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 06:48:35PM -0500, jwantz@hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > > While BASIC sounds like a good starting language in my opinion it is
> > > not. First, it is very non-standard (no two BASIC interpreters or
> > > compilers are alike). Second, file i/o in most BASICs is really rather
> > > painful. As far as I know, the only BASIC widely used in WINDOWS is
> > > Visual BASIC which is hardly free!
> > >
> > > Jim Wantz
> > > n Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Alex Snow wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would use, and want to learn, basic, if there was a free Compiler and/or
> > > > IDE for basic under winblows.
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Gregory Nowak" <gnowak1@uic.edu>
> > > > To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 2:56 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: free programming language
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > How about BASIC?
> > > > > Greg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:25:38PM -0500, Alex Snow wrote:
> > > > > > Hi.
> > > > > > I am looking for a programming language for windows that is both free
> > > > and easy to learn for a beginning programmer. Does such a language exist?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Alex Snow
` Janina Sajka
` jwantz
` Gregory Nowak
` Alex Snow
` Gregory Nowak
` jwantz
` Gregory Nowak
` jwantz
` Janina Sajka
` jwantz
` Thomas D. Ward
` Angelo Sonnesso
` Pete
` jwantz
` Janina Sajka
` jwantz
` Janina Sajka
` Pete
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Pete
` Rich Caloggero
` Alex Snow
` viruses Alex Snow
` viruses Pete
` free programming language Pete
` jwantz
` Brian Borowski
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Gregory Nowak
` Steve Holmes
` Thomas D. Ward [this message]
` Yvonne Smith
` Ron Marriage
` Pete
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Pete
` Ron Marriage
` Pete
` jwantz
` Pete
` Alex Snow
` Gregory Nowak
` jwantz
` Janina Sajka
` jwantz
` Gregory Nowak
` Pete
` Janina Sajka
` google randy turner
` google Igor Gueths
` google Janina Sajka
` google Ann Parsons
` google Ann Parsons
` free programming language jwantz
` Charles Hallenbeck
` randy turner
` Charles Hallenbeck
` jwantz
` Ameer Armaly
` Igor Gueths
` Ameer Armaly
` Angelo Sonnesso
` Thomas Ward
` jwantz
` Alex Snow
` Gregory Nowak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0203121107560.2670-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tward@bright.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).