From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from chmls18.ne.ipsvc.net ([24.147.1.153]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16XTql-0002fu-00 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 16:06:59 -0500 Received: from h005004cf6187.ne.mediaone.net (IDENT:WR+X/vpPr7EzgeBXEy06rPgSDGG2Rl/1@h005004cf6187.ne.mediaone.net [65.96.159.27]) by chmls18.ne.ipsvc.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g13L6tG00993 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:07:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 16:05:19 -0500 (EST) From: Dave Hunt X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: blind friendly or people friendly In-Reply-To: <011601c1ace6$4828bf10$0de03244@cp286066a> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: As long as I don't use Linux on company time, they leave me alone:). On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, David Poehlman wrote: > but they allow you to be conformant so why not? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Hunt" > To: > Cc: "Speakup Distribution List" > Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 1:42 PM > Subject: Re: blind friendly or people friendly > > > In principal, I agree. However, to many, my employers included, > Microsoft is the industry. > > -Dave > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, David Poehlman wrote: > > > I agree. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Charles Hallenbeck" > > To: "Speakup Distribution List" > > Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 1:27 PM > > Subject: blind friendly or people friendly > > > > > > All the recent posts about how to configure outlook express to be > > "blind friendly" is a little troubling to me. It seems to me that > > the issue is bigger than that. There are industry standards, and > > there are Microsoft standards, and often the problem comes > > because the two are not the same. One way to resolve the problem > > is for everyone, blind or otherwise, to use outlook express and > > thus use Microsoft standards everywhere. But the world is larger > > than Microsoft, and many of us who use Linux follow the industry > > standard - e.g., plain text for email, iso8859-1 for a standard > > western character set, and the like. > > > > Another way to resolve the problem is for users of outlook > > express, blind or otherwise, to configure their software to > > adhere to industry standards rather than Microsoft standards. I > > think that is very different from being "blind friendly"... It is > > being "people friendly". > > > > Grumpily - Chuck > > > > > > Visit me now at http://www.valstar.net/~hallenbeck > > The Moon is Waning Gibbous (59% of Full) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >