public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Villa <rvilla1@swbell.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 04:40:20 -0600 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201300438060.1770-100000@dhcppc2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008101c1a943$09f2e1e0$0100a8c0@tward>

When you do a clean install of RH7.2, does the system use the ext 3 FS 
by default?

If not, is there a way to do a convertion without having to do a 
complete reinstall?

Richard
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Thomas Ward wrote:

> Well, I've noticed that slow down in spead myself. One way to help spead
> things up is to use the ext3 fs which works much better than ext2.
> One major difference between 6.2 and 7.2 is that 7.2 comes with the kudzu
> pnp hardware maniger. Kudzu tracks new and removed hardware, and attempts to
> configure it for you.
> A second change is the X-Windows server ois much newer, but on my 1.2 GHZ
> box the little drop in spead is worth getting all the new tools. At least
> for me.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Amanda Lee <amanda@shellworld.net>
> To: Speakup@Braille.Uwo.Ca <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:18 PM
> Subject: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2
> 
> 
> >
> > Hmmm I know that it is likely that RH 6.2 with Speakup enabled does not
> have
> > the most current version of Speakup patched into the Kernel but here's an
> > interesting comment from a friend whose judgement I respect a good deal.
> >
> > So to the other experts herein, please share your thoughts.
> >
> > He prefers RH 6.2 for the following reason:
> > RH 7.2 seems to be significantly slower, with lots more disk thrashing,
> and
> > it's
> > not just X Windows (although it's also significantly slower).
> >
> > So my question is...  What is enabled in RH 7.2 that you won't see in RH
> 6.2
> >
> > Amanda Lee
> > Alexandria, VA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 



  reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 Amanda Lee
 ` Thomas Ward
   ` Richard Villa [this message]
     ` Thomas Ward
     ` Mitchell
       ` William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-777-8123
   ` Kirk Wood
     ` Thomas Ward
       ` Victor Tsaran
   ` Darrell Shandrow
 Dawes, Stephen
 Dawes, Stephen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0201300438060.1770-100000@dhcppc2 \
    --to=rvilla1@swbell.net \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).