From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gshang@uq.net.au>
Received: from uq.net.au(fox.uq.net.au[203.101.255.1]) (1156 bytes) by
 braille.uwo.ca
	via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
	(sender: <gshang@uq.net.au>)
	id <m14aqC6-0013sSC@braille.uwo.ca>
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 21:30:22 -0500 (EST)
	(Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
Received: from data.home (mail@dyn-28-15.dialin.uq.net.au [203.100.28.15])
	by uq.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22390
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:30:22 +1000 (GMT+1000)
Received: from geoff by data.home with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14aopG-0004ak-00; Thu, 08 Mar 2001 11:02:42 +1000
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 11:02:41 +1000 (EST)
From: Geoff Shang <gshang@uq.net.au>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.18 help please
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103062132510.1108-100000@ignatious>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0103081058040.16907-100000@data.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: <speakup.linux-speakup.org>

Hi:

I might just point out (in case it's relevant), that rc.modules in only in
distributions like slackware that use the BSD setup (I think that's what
it's called).  Redhat and debian use the system v setup which seems to load
modules per application, rather than in one place.  I guess there's
something to be said for both methods.

Geoff.