From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from arcturus.worldwidenews.net ([206.165.199.6]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15G2Gg-0005T2-00 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:41:23 -0400 Received: from maranatha (mail@wa-1-kit-104.worldfront.net [206.165.199.154]) by arcturus.worldwidenews.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5THb4a04764 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:37:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chomiak@worldfront.com) Received: from chomiak (helo=localhost) by maranatha with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15G2Fh-0000RN-00 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:40:21 -0700 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:40:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Cheryl Homiak To: speakup Subject: Re: Keymap problem maybe? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Frank Carmickle wrote: If you make clean and recompile you should get a happy alt > key. What happened was that speakup's keymap was undefined but no code > changed so the make process thought that the default keymap was up to > date. So make clean and then rock&roll with the compile. I'm going to try your suggestion, but this doesn't totally make sense to me. For one thing, console-tools wasn't finding a keymap before I did a recompile so do I have to do make clean and recompile the speakup kernel code too? Also, I didn't do the no-speech kernel from the same tree as the speakup kernel. I re-unpacked the 2.4.5.tar.gz file and did my no-speech compile from that, and I re-linked the new source tree with /usr/src/linux before compiling and made sure it was in no way linked with the original source I had done with speakup compiled in. Will let you know if the process you suggested helps, but I'm puzzled as to why it should be necessary. Cheryl