From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from c716099-a.rchdsn1.tx.home.com ([24.7.105.70] helo=ignatious) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15OLXn-0004CB-00 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:53:23 -0400 Received: from cpt.kirk (helo=localhost) by ignatious with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15OLtS-0001fn-00 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:15:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:15:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Wood X-Sender: cpt.kirk@ignatious To: "speakup@braille.uwo.ca" Subject: Re: virtual consoles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: There is a simple, logical reason for a default install to have only 6 virtual consoles. This leaves the other six function keys for switch to the associated frame buffer. Now this probably doesn't mean much unless you happen to be running X. When you launch X from the first virtual console, the display is sent to the frame buffer that is found at ALT-F6. While in X you can see the console messages by pressing CTRL-ALT-F1. You could launch an X session for each of the virtual consoles. In fact at least one distribution does just that. Given that few on this list will be running X anytime soon (other then to a few programs to run), there should be no reason to not have more virtual consoles. There is a slight trade-off in that each virtual console will take a small amount of resources. But if you have a relatively new system, you probably have an abbundance of resources and would never see the difference. ======= Kirk Wood Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net The mind is like a parachute; it works much better when open. If you're too open minded, your brains will fall out.