From: Kirk Wood <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: seeking advice for speeders
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:09:28 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107132201060.24288-100000@ignatious> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000c01c10bf9$e1922c60$0300a8c0@swbell.net>
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Richard Villa wrote:
> I had a choice and decided to go with DSL. If you go with cable, your speed
> can at times degrade due to the number of users on the line.
Sorry, but can't let this crap fly. *All* connections can slow due to
number of connections. Further, many people at work share a T1 line and
don't seem to have this problem. For this affect to be noticed, you would
literally need every person on your loop to decide to hit the net
feverishly. I have never had this problem in three years.
Now for the simple facts. The DSL is typically a little slower in the
first place. Often the DSL is artificially held at a lower rate then the
line supports. They meter you to not be able to get more then you pay for.
Finally, the most important thing is to remember that eventually you share
bandwidth. The ISP absolutely has to sell more bandwidth then they
actually pay for to make themselves profitable. Thus if every subscriber
hits the lines at a given time, the ISP will slow to a crawl. Simple
economics will prove this. Consider that a T1 costs close to $1000 a
month. The ISP portion of DSL typically runs $10 to $15 a month for a
384Kbs rate. Thus four subscribers make up the purchase of a single T1
line. Simple math will tell you that for a single T1 line, the ISP must
sell many multiples of their own bandwidth just to pay that portion of
their overhead.
Quite simply, either route you go, you will often notice that one site is
slower then another. You can actually get a feel for how well a given site
is connected versus their data load. In the end, you will share your
bandwidth with your neighbors.
=======
Kirk Wood
Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net
The mind is like a parachute; it works much better when open.
If you're too open minded, your brains will fall out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Charles Hallenbeck
` Terry D. Cudney
` Richard Villa
` Kirk Wood [this message]
` Ann Parsons
` Janina Sajka
` Kirk Wood
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Terry D. Cudney
` Gregory Nowak
` DSL modems Kirk Wood
` Gregory Nowak
` seeking advice for speeders Ann Parsons
` Gregory Nowak
` Janina Sajka
` Kirk Wood
` Gregory Nowak
` Janina Sajka
` Charles Hallenbeck
` Gregory Nowak
` Kirk Wood
` Janina Sajka
` Gregory Nowak
` Frank Carmickle
` Richard Villa
` Raul A. Gallegos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0107132201060.24288-100000@ignatious \
--to=cpt.kirk@1tree.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).