From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from c716099-a.rchdsn1.tx.home.com ([24.7.105.70] helo=ignatious) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 156Xu9-0000nq-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 09:26:53 -0400 Received: from cpt.kirk (helo=localhost) by ignatious with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 156YFR-0002zM-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 08:48:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:48:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Wood X-Sender: cpt.kirk@ignatious To: Speakup List Subject: Re: A more complete log about my disk access errors In-Reply-To: <20010603142214.C16596@joana.gotss.eu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 12:14:09AM +0200, Victor Tsaran wrote: > OK, if it turns out that I was fooled by Windows during all this time, > do you know of any parameter which I could use to tell Linux to fall to > PIO mode right away? One way to keep it from ever going into UDMA mode is to remove the support in the kernel. If you don't compile it in, it won't kick in. (Yes, it can work on the obvious.) Regardless of the settings, the standard macroslop and intel have pushed is that the drive starts in PIO mode at boot and switches when the 32 bit drivers send the signal. The better cables could be a large factor. I would recomend going with the shortest possible and if you only use one drive, get a cable without the connector for the second drive. The second conductor is there to help keep the good signal in the cable and the bad signal out of the cable. When looking at the performance issues, the reality is that you will only see a morginal increase in speed. While UDMA raises the speed of data transfer across the wire considerably, this will only happen if the data requested is in the hardware cache of the drive (and all drives have this). If there is a miss, or sustained transfer the rate will max out arround 7 MB per second. (This lower rate is the rate of transfer to and from the medium.) This is why RAID can increas speeds so dramatically. It will read the data from multiple drives at once. ======= Kirk Wood Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net Nothing is hard if you know the answer or are used to doing it.