From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from c716099-a.rchdsn1.tx.home.com ([24.7.105.70] helo=ignatious) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 156OZh-0005mt-00 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 23:29:09 -0400 Received: from cpt.kirk (helo=localhost) by ignatious with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 156Ov0-0001YJ-00 for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 22:51:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:51:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Wood X-Sender: cpt.kirk@ignatious To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: A more complete log about my disk access errors In-Reply-To: <000e01c0ebbe$ff53f5e0$b621fea9@cybertsar> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.4 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Victor Tsaran wrote: > But why UltraDMA? Are DMA and UltraDMA much different from each other? Actually they are. :) UltraDMA sounds so much better and sells way more hardware. DMA is just a short form of UltraDMA. There was no DMA standard prior to UDMA. ======= Kirk Wood Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net Nothing is hard if you know the answer or are used to doing it.