From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mhonline.net(bandaid.mhonline.net[204.97.156.9]) (1397 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:smtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 06:44:18 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: (qmail 18326 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 11:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 209-23-55-62.ip.termserv.net) (209.23.55.62) by smtp.mhonline.net with SMTP; 21 Dec 2000 11:44:19 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 06:46:36 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Hallenbeck To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: some suggestions and a question` In-Reply-To: <009a01c06afd$265d6920$c5b4f7a5@oemcomputer> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Hi Ameer - The main trouble with windows screenreaders is that they only work in windows. Chuck. On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Ameer Armaly wrote: > Hi list! > I am a newbe to linux and speakup, but I wil n jpin another list, besides, you can answer everything. > Anyway, I don't see the point about speakup beeing command based. > Having to edit this to get that, windows screenreaders are more usable, even if the don't have a very complicated installationAnd also, what is the CVS version of speakup. > Is it aspecialy devoted to the pharmecy? > Well thanks > Ameer > > My web site is http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh "It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I'm wearing Milk Bone underwear."