From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>
Received: from ignatious.1tree.com(c716099-a.rchdsn1.tx.home.com[24.7.105.70])
 (1127 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca
	via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe
	(sender: <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>)
	id <m13okzy-0013u6C@braille.uwo.ca>
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:15:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
Received: from cpt.kirk (helo=localhost)
	by ignatious.1tree.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13ol54-0000Fx-00
	for <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:20:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 06:20:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Kirk Wood <cpt.kirk@1tree.net>
X-Sender: cpt.kirk@ignatious.1tree.com
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: partial success - still need help
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001025233242.009eeeb0@wapvi.bc.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010260615390.988-100000@ignatious.1tree.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: <speakup.linux-speakup.org>

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, tyler spivey wrote:
> nullmodem com2 decpc emulated com3 dont think anythings on com1

I think I may understand (but could be off). More specifically you have a
null modem cable on com2 going to another machine. You then have a dectalk
pc (internal card) that is setup to communicate with the hardware as com3.
Is this much correct?

=======
Kirk Wood
Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net