From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost.localdomain(c716099-a.rchdsn1.tx.home.com[24.7.105.70]) (1392 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:10:29 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from localhost (cpt.kirk@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA14374 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:14:43 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: cpt.kirk owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:14:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Wood X-Sender: cpt.kirk@localhost.localdomain To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: FW: BRIAN LIVINGSTON: "Window Manager" from InfoWorld.com, Monday,June 26, 2000 In-Reply-To: <001f01bfe07c$96152d40$36910f8e@dpsd.gov.calgary.ab.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: While I don't expect that the included tip will hurt a Windows computer, I seriously doubt it will help. I have yet to see a computer that seemed to have a bottleneck at the NIC. I just wish I could afford such internet access. Then again, what would be the point? Few sites are capable of sending out the data at that rate anyway. If anyone tries this and it helps please drop me a note. I remain quite skeptical. -- Kirk Wood Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net ------------------ Seek simplicity -- and distrust it. Alfred North Whitehead