From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.bellatlantic.net([199.45.39.156]) (1682 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:38:07 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from sajka.bellatlantic.net (adsl-151-200-20-29.bellatlantic.net [151.200.20.29]) by smtp-out1.bellatlantic.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA28627; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:38:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (janina@localhost) by sajka.bellatlantic.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA04222; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:38:19 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: sajka.bellatlantic.net: janina owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:38:19 -0500 (EST) From: Janina Sajka X-Sender: janina@sajka.bellatlantic.net To: scott howell cc: cpt.kirk@1tree.net, speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: braille input In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Scott, You raise a very good point. Most people writing with a stylus don't punch the way a blind slate and stylus user punches. This is definitely an issue. Janina Sajka, Director Information Systems Research & Development American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) janina@afb.net On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, scott howell wrote: > I think this PDA is a great idea. Of course it would have to be prety > tough for us old slate users who know how to drive that stylous. > Actually this would be a very logical solution. I'm not so sure if another > Braille-N-Speak type device is needed. Just my thoughts. > Be happy to help where I can. > > > >