From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.bellatlantic.net([199.45.39.156]) (1864 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:15:53 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from sajka.bellatlantic.net (adsl-151-200-20-29.bellatlantic.net [151.200.20.29]) by smtp-out1.bellatlantic.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA16988; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:15:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (janina@localhost) by sajka.bellatlantic.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA03899; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:16:05 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: sajka.bellatlantic.net: janina owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 20:16:05 -0500 (EST) From: Janina Sajka X-Sender: janina@sajka.bellatlantic.net To: cpt.kirk@1tree.net cc: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: braille input In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Yes, you're correct. Please forgive if I've offended. Janina Sajka, Director Information Systems Research & Development American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) janina@afb.net On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 cpt.kirk@1tree.net wrote: > I agree that it would be easy to flip the braille. But often times the > obvious gets left out of software. The list of easy to implement options > that were left out is too long as it is. i am just stating up front, that > I feel it best to implement the option. I wouldn't care to hear from the > guy who is peeved at not having such an easy to implement option. > > Kirk Wood > Cpt.Kirk@1tree.net > ------------------ > > Your fly might be open (but don't check it just now). > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup >